<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAP Alert Reviews I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 13:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: toofatforyou</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-26440</link>
		<dc:creator>toofatforyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 03:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-26440</guid>
		<description>this man is just sad. How can he be allowed to foster children when he has no real job? These reviews cost NOTHING to make no matter what the creep says. $300 per review? thats just ridiculous. How he ever convinced anyone to donate for him is a mystery to me. 

All I can say is I feel bad for his kids. They get sent to live with an unemployed old man who allows no one to have their own opinions and treats even the older kids like babies. I seriously would run away if I were them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this man is just sad. How can he be allowed to foster children when he has no real job? These reviews cost NOTHING to make no matter what the creep says. $300 per review? thats just ridiculous. How he ever convinced anyone to donate for him is a mystery to me. </p>
<p>All I can say is I feel bad for his kids. They get sent to live with an unemployed old man who allows no one to have their own opinions and treats even the older kids like babies. I seriously would run away if I were them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dookers</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-23196</link>
		<dc:creator>Dookers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-23196</guid>
		<description>I &lt;i&gt;despise&lt;/i&gt; how Cappyman seems to not want kids to become worldly at younger ages, especially as this world gets &lt;i&gt;more and more nuts&lt;/i&gt;! I mean, isn't that agist? But, then again, it was Cappyman who caused me to become worldly and self-conscious like I am today anyways through his &lt;i&gt;seemingly-innocent site back when I was twelve....&lt;/i&gt;....damn hypocrite. 

The Cappyman digusts me......damn it. I had a childhood, I don't need to keep having one till I turn eighteen...remidns me of a story I heard about a girl named Anissa or Aneesa Jones who the producers for a show tried to keep from growing, and they made her play with dolls and bind her breasts in public meetings, and the girl eventually killed herself after the show she was on went off the air. I think that's what Cappyman is trying to do to us people.

And &lt;i&gt;then&lt;/i&gt; he edits e-mails to make teenagers look intoxicated or gsy or something!

....I know advocating violence is probably against the rules here [&lt;b&gt;EDIT: Yes, it is. &#8212;Ebonmuse&lt;/b&gt;] ...and this is a fourteen-year-old typing here. One with strong beliefs, but still a fourteen-year-old.

I think Gavroche from &lt;i&gt;Les Miserables&lt;/i&gt; said it best:

'&lt;i&gt;We may look easy pickings
But we got some bite.
So never kick a dog
Because he's just a pup,
Or you'd better run for cover when the pup grows up.&lt;/i&gt;'


There's a kid who wasn't sheltered by some homophobic full-quivered conformist freak, even if he most likely wasn't real. From the perfect song to sing to Cappyman and watch him become aroused and his lips to pucker and his whole face to go beet red as he realizes how agist he is and tries to push the sudden realization off of him as he hears about how sparrows and hawks can make a happy home and about how &lt;i&gt;worldliness isn't necessarily a &lt;/i&gt;bad thing&lt;i&gt;, dammit.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <i>despise</i> how Cappyman seems to not want kids to become worldly at younger ages, especially as this world gets <i>more and more nuts</i>! I mean, isn't that agist? But, then again, it was Cappyman who caused me to become worldly and self-conscious like I am today anyways through his <i>seemingly-innocent site back when I was twelve....</i>....damn hypocrite. </p>
<p>The Cappyman digusts me......damn it. I had a childhood, I don't need to keep having one till I turn eighteen...remidns me of a story I heard about a girl named Anissa or Aneesa Jones who the producers for a show tried to keep from growing, and they made her play with dolls and bind her breasts in public meetings, and the girl eventually killed herself after the show she was on went off the air. I think that's what Cappyman is trying to do to us people.</p>
<p>And <i>then</i> he edits e-mails to make teenagers look intoxicated or gsy or something!</p>
<p>....I know advocating violence is probably against the rules here [<b>EDIT: Yes, it is. &mdash;Ebonmuse</b>] ...and this is a fourteen-year-old typing here. One with strong beliefs, but still a fourteen-year-old.</p>
<p>I think Gavroche from <i>Les Miserables</i> said it best:</p>
<p>'<i>We may look easy pickings<br />
But we got some bite.<br />
So never kick a dog<br />
Because he's just a pup,<br />
Or you'd better run for cover when the pup grows up.</i>'</p>
<p>There's a kid who wasn't sheltered by some homophobic full-quivered conformist freak, even if he most likely wasn't real. From the perfect song to sing to Cappyman and watch him become aroused and his lips to pucker and his whole face to go beet red as he realizes how agist he is and tries to push the sudden realization off of him as he hears about how sparrows and hawks can make a happy home and about how <i>worldliness isn't necessarily a </i>bad thing<i>, dammit.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FM</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-21818</link>
		<dc:creator>FM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 03:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-21818</guid>
		<description>Actually, Dookers, I think he meant that he saw it six days after it was released, and he's posting this seven day after that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Dookers, I think he meant that he saw it six days after it was released, and he's posting this seven day after that...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dookers</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-12803</link>
		<dc:creator>Dookers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-12803</guid>
		<description>"&lt;i&gt;I love the way they couple the warnings against Satan with an appeal for more money!&lt;/i&gt;"


Yup, I agree. My mom read &lt;i&gt;The Da Vinci Code&lt;/i&gt; and understood it, even gained new perspectives on Christianity, and then she saw the movie which she said was boring and made no sense unless you read the book. And blaming "the adversary" for something that could mean a computer breaking (I guess...) is just insane, and why not refer to it as "Satan" like other fundies, even though that could more easily be made fun of??! 

And "seven days since I viewed it and six days since its opening"?! How &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; Tom Calder get into movie theaters early like that? &lt;i&gt;Or&lt;/i&gt; did he get the dates messed up? ither way, always remember that whatever Tom says goes, and remember God Calder's Word! *explodes in sarcasm*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"<i>I love the way they couple the warnings against Satan with an appeal for more money!</i>"</p>
<p>Yup, I agree. My mom read <i>The Da Vinci Code</i> and understood it, even gained new perspectives on Christianity, and then she saw the movie which she said was boring and made no sense unless you read the book. And blaming "the adversary" for something that could mean a computer breaking (I guess...) is just insane, and why not refer to it as "Satan" like other fundies, even though that could more easily be made fun of??! </p>
<p>And "seven days since I viewed it and six days since its opening"?! How <i>does</i> Tom Calder get into movie theaters early like that? <i>Or</i> did he get the dates messed up? ither way, always remember that whatever Tom says goes, and remember God Calder's Word! *explodes in sarcasm*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3652</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 08:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3652</guid>
		<description>I think the whole idea of Magic in an RPG setting would see these good follks running for the hills, Ipetrich. 

I run a D&#38;D based campaign loosely based on the Crusades. Of course, theism is obviously true in D&#38;D: the closest one can get to atheism is a conviction that the gods are not worthy of worship. The question of whether there is a deistic Creator God is left open though...in my campaign that is the main religous difference behind the 'Crusade'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the whole idea of Magic in an RPG setting would see these good follks running for the hills, Ipetrich. </p>
<p>I run a D&amp;D based campaign loosely based on the Crusades. Of course, theism is obviously true in D&amp;D: the closest one can get to atheism is a conviction that the gods are not worthy of worship. The question of whether there is a deistic Creator God is left open though...in my campaign that is the main religous difference behind the 'Crusade'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azkyroth</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3642</link>
		<dc:creator>Azkyroth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 02:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3642</guid>
		<description>Speaking as a parent...

LOFL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as a parent...</p>
<p>LOFL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ridger</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3641</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ridger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 01:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3641</guid>
		<description>Gosh, if the adversary is working so hard to keep them from posting that review, why wasn't it their first priority? Why didn't they do it for nothing, to get points ... er, good karma ... er, remove the stone from the path? (Yeah, that's the right one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, if the adversary is working so hard to keep them from posting that review, why wasn't it their first priority? Why didn't they do it for nothing, to get points ... er, good karma ... er, remove the stone from the path? (Yeah, that's the right one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lpetrich</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3636</link>
		<dc:creator>lpetrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 22:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3636</guid>
		<description>"Unholy resurrection"???

The CAP guys ought not to watch Star Trek, because it has had some dead or seemingly dead characters who later come back to life.

Like TOS "Amok Time", where Spock kills Kirk -- or so he thinks. Or the movies "The Wrath of Khan" where Spock dies, followed by "The Search for Spock", where he gets resurrected. I wonder if some "Trekkie" has put together a list of died-and-resurrected Star Trek characters and the episodes where those events happened.

And they ought not to play certain role-playing games, because in those ones, a character can get the ability to resurrect other characters who have died. I myself have gotten that ability and used it in some of the playing I've done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Unholy resurrection"???</p>
<p>The CAP guys ought not to watch Star Trek, because it has had some dead or seemingly dead characters who later come back to life.</p>
<p>Like TOS "Amok Time", where Spock kills Kirk -- or so he thinks. Or the movies "The Wrath of Khan" where Spock dies, followed by "The Search for Spock", where he gets resurrected. I wonder if some "Trekkie" has put together a list of died-and-resurrected Star Trek characters and the episodes where those events happened.</p>
<p>And they ought not to play certain role-playing games, because in those ones, a character can get the ability to resurrect other characters who have died. I myself have gotten that ability and used it in some of the playing I've done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebonmuse</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3624</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 16:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3624</guid>
		<description>Oh, the CAP review of &lt;i&gt;The Da Vinci Code&lt;/i&gt; is going to be a post all its own, trust me. :)

&lt;blockquote&gt;"Office Space: pornographic background music"

They're not talking about a sleazy saxaphone; while the protagonist is taking back his freedom, they play rap music with lyrics like this:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I'm not certain if that's what this point was meant to refer to. The CAP reviewer makes it clear in several places that his rating system never deducts points from movies twice for the same thing, and he does list vulgarity and curse words separately elsewhere in the review. I suppose the only way to be sure would be to write in and ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, the CAP review of <i>The Da Vinci Code</i> is going to be a post all its own, trust me. :)</p>
<blockquote><p>"Office Space: pornographic background music"</p>
<p>They're not talking about a sleazy saxaphone; while the protagonist is taking back his freedom, they play rap music with lyrics like this:</p></blockquote>
<p>I'm not certain if that's what this point was meant to refer to. The CAP reviewer makes it clear in several places that his rating system never deducts points from movies twice for the same thing, and he does list vulgarity and curse words separately elsewhere in the review. I suppose the only way to be sure would be to write in and ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rowan</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3621</link>
		<dc:creator>Rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 15:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/cap-alert-reviews-i.html#comment-3621</guid>
		<description>Hehe...that was a good read!

From the introduction to the Da Vinci Code:

"I am so sorry this report has taken so long to complete, a full seven days after viewing it and a full six days after its opening. I could not hope to list all of the trouble experienced. I fully believe getting this single analysis report published was plagued with more obstacles than any other of the more than 1000 other reports we have done. Hint: It all has to do with lack of donations/funding. Something tells me the adversary did not want this report published. 

That the adversary is actively involved in creating so many obstacles, especially to this report, makes sense since we are fighting the adversary quite probably in his most sensitive spot -- his attacks of Jesus through His little ones. It makes sense also since this film has the potential for doing a g-r-e-a-t deal of Spiritual damage to our youth who have become, also by the adversary's doing, more worldly than ever at younger and younger ages every year. I suspect most of our readers have the caliber of faith and understanding to be able figure this out without me explaining it further."

I love the way they couple the warnings against Satan with an appeal for more money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe...that was a good read!</p>
<p>From the introduction to the Da Vinci Code:</p>
<p>"I am so sorry this report has taken so long to complete, a full seven days after viewing it and a full six days after its opening. I could not hope to list all of the trouble experienced. I fully believe getting this single analysis report published was plagued with more obstacles than any other of the more than 1000 other reports we have done. Hint: It all has to do with lack of donations/funding. Something tells me the adversary did not want this report published. </p>
<p>That the adversary is actively involved in creating so many obstacles, especially to this report, makes sense since we are fighting the adversary quite probably in his most sensitive spot -- his attacks of Jesus through His little ones. It makes sense also since this film has the potential for doing a g-r-e-a-t deal of Spiritual damage to our youth who have become, also by the adversary's doing, more worldly than ever at younger and younger ages every year. I suspect most of our readers have the caliber of faith and understanding to be able figure this out without me explaining it further."</p>
<p>I love the way they couple the warnings against Satan with an appeal for more money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
