<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Do We Care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  7 Jan 2009 02:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: EdSG</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-34347</link>
		<dc:creator>EdSG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-34347</guid>
		<description>I'm wondering around the site as a new-found source of enlightenment for the atheist perspective, which I wholeheartedly share.
In this post in particular, I just want to point out a new site launched a few months ago which nails down why we should care: &lt;a href="http://whatstheharm.net/" rel="nofollow"&gt;What's The Harm?&lt;/a&gt;.
This is a summary account of some of the dangers one is exposed to when failing to think critically, or when being subject of abuse by those who don't care about it. That's another reason why we care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm wondering around the site as a new-found source of enlightenment for the atheist perspective, which I wholeheartedly share.<br />
In this post in particular, I just want to point out a new site launched a few months ago which nails down why we should care: <a href="http://whatstheharm.net/" rel="nofollow">What's The Harm?</a>.<br />
This is a summary account of some of the dangers one is exposed to when failing to think critically, or when being subject of abuse by those who don't care about it. That's another reason why we care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lpetrich</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29822</link>
		<dc:creator>lpetrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29822</guid>
		<description>There have been advocates of more-or-less feminist opinions over the centuries, all the way back to ancient Greece and Rome. But a big feminist movement only got started in the US, the UK, and elsewhere in the 1850's and lasted until the 1920's; this first wave of feminism faded from view then. The second wave got started some decades later, in the 1960's, and has continued to this day, though some people distinguish a third wave which had emerged from the second one in the 1980's.

In any case, over most of that time, the clergy have not exactly been bra-burning feminists. It must be said that the most feminist religious groups at present are various New Agers and neopagans and Unitarians and the like -- not the more traditionalist Xians.

And although atheism and freethought in general have no necessary connection with feminism, atheists/freethinkers have tended to be relatively feminist. This goes back to the 19th cy., where Elizabeth Cady Stanton had written the feminist classic on Biblical sexism, &lt;i&gt;The Woman's Bible&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been advocates of more-or-less feminist opinions over the centuries, all the way back to ancient Greece and Rome. But a big feminist movement only got started in the US, the UK, and elsewhere in the 1850's and lasted until the 1920's; this first wave of feminism faded from view then. The second wave got started some decades later, in the 1960's, and has continued to this day, though some people distinguish a third wave which had emerged from the second one in the 1980's.</p>
<p>In any case, over most of that time, the clergy have not exactly been bra-burning feminists. It must be said that the most feminist religious groups at present are various New Agers and neopagans and Unitarians and the like -- not the more traditionalist Xians.</p>
<p>And although atheism and freethought in general have no necessary connection with feminism, atheists/freethinkers have tended to be relatively feminist. This goes back to the 19th cy., where Elizabeth Cady Stanton had written the feminist classic on Biblical sexism, <i>The Woman's Bible</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theistscientist</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29819</link>
		<dc:creator>theistscientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29819</guid>
		<description>Mr. ebonmouse, I am getting my threads confused, I may have posted my answer to you on the wrong thread.Anyway, I wanted to compliment you on the extraordinarily professional and polite blog you have running here. Leadership flows from the top down. Perhaps you should be running IIDB and they would go back to being a first rate forum. Also, I read your material on the enlightenment and learned some things I didnt know. I may have underestimated the freethinker contribution to the enlightenment. I will study this some more and respond in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. ebonmouse, I am getting my threads confused, I may have posted my answer to you on the wrong thread.Anyway, I wanted to compliment you on the extraordinarily professional and polite blog you have running here. Leadership flows from the top down. Perhaps you should be running IIDB and they would go back to being a first rate forum. Also, I read your material on the enlightenment and learned some things I didnt know. I may have underestimated the freethinker contribution to the enlightenment. I will study this some more and respond in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas S</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29812</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 02:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29812</guid>
		<description>Theistscientist,

Speaking only for myself, I tend to go in waves.  This summer, I was all over a board about building trailers.  Six months before that, I was really into a bbs for GMRS radio systems.  I'm in a Daylight Atheism phase right now.

I considered your words.  I even started feeling a little silly.  Then, as I was driving to work it hit me -- a real "duh" moment.  The reason I care is that I personaly face real prejudice and discrimination as an Atheist.  The causes you mention might be worthy, but so is being able to be open about who you are without worrying about organized counter-attacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theistscientist,</p>
<p>Speaking only for myself, I tend to go in waves.  This summer, I was all over a board about building trailers.  Six months before that, I was really into a bbs for GMRS radio systems.  I'm in a Daylight Atheism phase right now.</p>
<p>I considered your words.  I even started feeling a little silly.  Then, as I was driving to work it hit me -- a real "duh" moment.  The reason I care is that I personaly face real prejudice and discrimination as an Atheist.  The causes you mention might be worthy, but so is being able to be open about who you are without worrying about organized counter-attacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebonmuse</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29773</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29773</guid>
		<description>No, I won't be. We &lt;a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/11/open-thread-3.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;went over this with another visitor&lt;/a&gt; last November, and I and others presented &lt;a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/11/open-thread-3.html#comment-28295" rel="nofollow"&gt;extensive lists&lt;/a&gt; showing that most of the more influential Enlightenment figures were atheists, freethinkers, or deists. Relatively few were orthodox Christians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I won't be. We <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/11/open-thread-3.html" rel="nofollow">went over this with another visitor</a> last November, and I and others presented <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/11/open-thread-3.html#comment-28295" rel="nofollow">extensive lists</a> showing that most of the more influential Enlightenment figures were atheists, freethinkers, or deists. Relatively few were orthodox Christians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theistscientist</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29771</link>
		<dc:creator>theistscientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29771</guid>
		<description>Mr. Ebon, can you name the top 100 change agent "UBER leaders" of the enlightenment? You will be very very surprised at their religious backgrounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Ebon, can you name the top 100 change agent "UBER leaders" of the enlightenment? You will be very very surprised at their religious backgrounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebonmuse</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29769</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29769</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A Barna study showed there were extraordinarily few atheist physicians that dedicate their practices to third world volunteer medical work.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, well, Barna is an evangelical Christian group whose surveys are explicitly done to support their particular religious viewpoint. I'd recommend taking them with a grain of salt, particularly since that opinion is contradicted by other studies which found that &lt;a href="http://oproject.wordpress.com/2007/08/02/non-religious-doctors-just-as-likely-to-care-for-poor/"&gt;atheist physicians were just as likely to provide free care for the poor&lt;/a&gt; as religious ones.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Even in the secular organization "Dr's without Borders" there is not a single atheist physician on their roster...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What on earth is your evidence for this? I'm not even aware that Doctors Without Borders publishes a comprehensive public list of every physician member, much less that it publishes such a list which includes its members' religious affiliations.

&lt;blockquote&gt;We could really use your help atheists.I am sincere in this.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What makes you think that atheists aren't already helping? It's just that, unlike many religious organizations, we don't feel the need to explicitly play up the link between nonbelief and charitable activity. In addition, unlike religious groups, we don't couple the help we provide with misleading superstitious advice that worsens the very problems we're trying to treat. For example, the Catholic church and many Protestant denominations &lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt; strongly oppose comprehensive sex education and the distribution of contraception, thus worsening the very problems of overpopulation and STDs we're trying to alleviate.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Why is it then, Ipetrich, that the Christian West is the far and away progressive leader in woman's suffrage...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because the Enlightenment forced Christian religious leaders to accept a more equal role for women against their will. That position certainly cannot be justified by the Bible, which repeatedly styles women the &lt;a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/11/religions-harm-to-women.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;inferior of men in every respect&lt;/a&gt;. Do you realize how many Christian denominations there are that &lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt; deny women leadership roles and teach that they are to be obedient and submissive to men?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A Barna study showed there were extraordinarily few atheist physicians that dedicate their practices to third world volunteer medical work.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, well, Barna is an evangelical Christian group whose surveys are explicitly done to support their particular religious viewpoint. I'd recommend taking them with a grain of salt, particularly since that opinion is contradicted by other studies which found that <a href="http://oproject.wordpress.com/2007/08/02/non-religious-doctors-just-as-likely-to-care-for-poor/">atheist physicians were just as likely to provide free care for the poor</a> as religious ones.</p>
<blockquote><p>Even in the secular organization "Dr's without Borders" there is not a single atheist physician on their roster...</p></blockquote>
<p>What on earth is your evidence for this? I'm not even aware that Doctors Without Borders publishes a comprehensive public list of every physician member, much less that it publishes such a list which includes its members' religious affiliations.</p>
<blockquote><p>We could really use your help atheists.I am sincere in this.</p></blockquote>
<p>What makes you think that atheists aren't already helping? It's just that, unlike many religious organizations, we don't feel the need to explicitly play up the link between nonbelief and charitable activity. In addition, unlike religious groups, we don't couple the help we provide with misleading superstitious advice that worsens the very problems we're trying to treat. For example, the Catholic church and many Protestant denominations <i>still</i> strongly oppose comprehensive sex education and the distribution of contraception, thus worsening the very problems of overpopulation and STDs we're trying to alleviate.</p>
<blockquote><p>Why is it then, Ipetrich, that the Christian West is the far and away progressive leader in woman's suffrage...</p></blockquote>
<p>Because the Enlightenment forced Christian religious leaders to accept a more equal role for women against their will. That position certainly cannot be justified by the Bible, which repeatedly styles women the <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/11/religions-harm-to-women.html" rel="nofollow">inferior of men in every respect</a>. Do you realize how many Christian denominations there are that <i>still</i> deny women leadership roles and teach that they are to be obedient and submissive to men?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theistscientist</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29764</link>
		<dc:creator>theistscientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29764</guid>
		<description>Why is it then, Ipetrich, that the Christian West is the far and away progressive leader in woman's suffrage, women being allowed to own property, enter the professions, serve on juries, being taught to read, allowed universl free public education, allowed to be general and flag officers in the military,etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it then, Ipetrich, that the Christian West is the far and away progressive leader in woman's suffrage, women being allowed to own property, enter the professions, serve on juries, being taught to read, allowed universl free public education, allowed to be general and flag officers in the military,etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lpetrich</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29741</link>
		<dc:creator>lpetrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29741</guid>
		<description>theistscientist, I respect your concern for your pet causes, but there are plenty of other causes that are worth supporting.

Like women's rights and feminism in general. Where have your beloved churches been in that one, theistscientist? The Bible is blatantly sexist from beginning to end, the only Xian churches with lots of female pastors are relatively liberal ones, and those ones got lots of female pastors only in recent decades. As Susan Jacoby has noted in her book "Freethinkers", feminism has mostly been a secular movement.

And science and technology and medical stuff like evolution and stem-cell research and abortion and birth control -- which churches support all these?

theistscientist, I suggest that you clean up your own house first and look at such blatant pseudoscience as your beloved God of the gaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theistscientist, I respect your concern for your pet causes, but there are plenty of other causes that are worth supporting.</p>
<p>Like women's rights and feminism in general. Where have your beloved churches been in that one, theistscientist? The Bible is blatantly sexist from beginning to end, the only Xian churches with lots of female pastors are relatively liberal ones, and those ones got lots of female pastors only in recent decades. As Susan Jacoby has noted in her book "Freethinkers", feminism has mostly been a secular movement.</p>
<p>And science and technology and medical stuff like evolution and stem-cell research and abortion and birth control -- which churches support all these?</p>
<p>theistscientist, I suggest that you clean up your own house first and look at such blatant pseudoscience as your beloved God of the gaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrnaglfar</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29739</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrnaglfar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/06/why-do-we-care.html#comment-29739</guid>
		<description>Theistscientist,

I perfer to think of what I go against more a fight against faith, that is the acceptance of things in lack of or in spite of evidence. Faith doesn't just happen in religions, it happens in all sorts of aspects of life, from the personal and up. It's this irrational thinking that is the cause of large parts of the world's problems, and what needs to be dealt with, pipe dream as it may be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theistscientist,</p>
<p>I perfer to think of what I go against more a fight against faith, that is the acceptance of things in lack of or in spite of evidence. Faith doesn't just happen in religions, it happens in all sorts of aspects of life, from the personal and up. It's this irrational thinking that is the cause of large parts of the world's problems, and what needs to be dealt with, pipe dream as it may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
