<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch This Space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:09:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-25047</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-25047</guid>
		<description>I find it all too convenient for any people of any religious culture to produce code that predicts or tells of any past events. It is far too biased with an underlying agenda that is way too visible if you look at through unbias logic. Secrets are power, and he who holds the word of god is the next messiah. There is a lot at stake and large of groups of easily panicked people will garner in the next &quot;messiah&quot; with no question and that is when we need to be watching most diligiently. Prophecy is just a bit too convenient for those who wish to push an agenda that is based off their beliefs. Mathematical equations can be developed to equate anything you wish to crank out any formulated output. If I not mistaken, the Hebrew language (and/or letters) has numeric equivalents. 3 + 2 = 5, 4 + 1 = 5, 6 - 1 = 5, 7 - 2 = 5 It would seem to me, not being a mathematician, that there are many different ways to come up with the same answer, and in my opinion, a convenient way to decipher the word of god. Numbers have different meanings, same sounding words with different vocal inflections can mean something completely different. Here we a the most faulty creation on the planet claiming to have uncoded the word of god. I smell  rat. Humans are the most untrustworthy, most violent, despicable creature on the planet, it wouldn&#039;t be surprising that we would seal own fate, but to have a &quot;religious book&quot; spell it out for us in code? Has anyone ever wondered why it has taken a computer to decipher the &quot;codes&quot;? 
Because it takes a lot of power to come up with something this far fetched. Anyone can come up an equation that will predict anything if there are enough words to allow it. There will eventually come a &quot;revelation&quot; within those prophetic words from our dear departed doctor, Dr. Suess as well. 

&quot;Green eggs and ham&quot; Green eggs = tactical nukes , ham = Jews, because we all know that Jews don&#039;t like ham. So we can say with such certainty that Dr. Suess was being prophetic about how the Jews would be attacked with &quot;green eggs&quot;...nuclear bombs. Wow! I&#039;m going to go buy a large red an white striped hat and dress up like a cat. 

Stupidity and arrogance comes in all shapes, colors and sizes...choose your lies wisely when searching for a god, for a god first has to exist before one can be saved by one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it all too convenient for any people of any religious culture to produce code that predicts or tells of any past events. It is far too biased with an underlying agenda that is way too visible if you look at through unbias logic. Secrets are power, and he who holds the word of god is the next messiah. There is a lot at stake and large of groups of easily panicked people will garner in the next "messiah" with no question and that is when we need to be watching most diligiently. Prophecy is just a bit too convenient for those who wish to push an agenda that is based off their beliefs. Mathematical equations can be developed to equate anything you wish to crank out any formulated output. If I not mistaken, the Hebrew language (and/or letters) has numeric equivalents. 3 + 2 = 5, 4 + 1 = 5, 6 - 1 = 5, 7 - 2 = 5 It would seem to me, not being a mathematician, that there are many different ways to come up with the same answer, and in my opinion, a convenient way to decipher the word of god. Numbers have different meanings, same sounding words with different vocal inflections can mean something completely different. Here we a the most faulty creation on the planet claiming to have uncoded the word of god. I smell  rat. Humans are the most untrustworthy, most violent, despicable creature on the planet, it wouldn't be surprising that we would seal own fate, but to have a "religious book" spell it out for us in code? Has anyone ever wondered why it has taken a computer to decipher the "codes"?<br />
Because it takes a lot of power to come up with something this far fetched. Anyone can come up an equation that will predict anything if there are enough words to allow it. There will eventually come a "revelation" within those prophetic words from our dear departed doctor, Dr. Suess as well. </p>
<p>"Green eggs and ham" Green eggs = tactical nukes , ham = Jews, because we all know that Jews don't like ham. So we can say with such certainty that Dr. Suess was being prophetic about how the Jews would be attacked with "green eggs"...nuclear bombs. Wow! I'm going to go buy a large red an white striped hat and dress up like a cat. </p>
<p>Stupidity and arrogance comes in all shapes, colors and sizes...choose your lies wisely when searching for a god, for a god first has to exist before one can be saved by one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4633</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4633</guid>
		<description>A particular issue here may be the exemption from taxation churches enjoy in some jurisdictions. If this exemption is extended to mega-churches, they become extremely competitive. Still at least America has formal seperation of Church and State, unlike my own United Kingdom...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A particular issue here may be the exemption from taxation churches enjoy in some jurisdictions. If this exemption is extended to mega-churches, they become extremely competitive. Still at least America has formal seperation of Church and State, unlike my own United Kingdom...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gay Species</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4632</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gay Species</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4632</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Holy Toledo&quot; article in a recent New Yorker, ostensibly about a religious Right running for governor, actually offered keen insights into the &quot;mega-church&quot; phenomenon. If only historical Christianity had the marketing insights and propaganda mechanisms many of these single mega-churches have, think how far worse we would be today. At least the phenomenon is largely isolated to the U.S.

A single Ohioan mega-church has a staff of 300 and an annual budget of $40 million! Few businesses reach this level of commercial success. Most Roman Catholic dioceses, with hundreds of parishes and many thousand more parishioners, don&#039;t approximate this level of &quot;industry and commerce.&quot; If this particular mega-church was isolated, then these extraordinary figures would not be startling. But it repeats itself throughout the country.

Non-denominational, evangelical Christianity is big business. No wonder it is a stalwart defender of unfettered capitalism! And to achieve this level of &quot;industry&quot; requires hoardes of &quot;consumers,&quot; many, if not most, are willing to follow the leader right into the political agenda of the religious right. Add their singular ability to &quot;network&quot; with each other, and no wonder their &quot;cross-marketing&quot; has made them such a political force in this country.

I&#039;m not begrudging any of it, although I find their &quot;brand&quot; of Christianity and Politics entirely repugnant. In fact, given the enormous financial success of this &quot;model,&quot; why are not others imitating it? Create a &quot;package,&quot; follow the mega-church model, and you&#039;ll be financially/politically set for life. It&#039;s Wal-mart ala religion with some very entrepreneurial pastors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The "Holy Toledo" article in a recent New Yorker, ostensibly about a religious Right running for governor, actually offered keen insights into the "mega-church" phenomenon. If only historical Christianity had the marketing insights and propaganda mechanisms many of these single mega-churches have, think how far worse we would be today. At least the phenomenon is largely isolated to the U.S.</p>
<p>A single Ohioan mega-church has a staff of 300 and an annual budget of $40 million! Few businesses reach this level of commercial success. Most Roman Catholic dioceses, with hundreds of parishes and many thousand more parishioners, don't approximate this level of "industry and commerce." If this particular mega-church was isolated, then these extraordinary figures would not be startling. But it repeats itself throughout the country.</p>
<p>Non-denominational, evangelical Christianity is big business. No wonder it is a stalwart defender of unfettered capitalism! And to achieve this level of "industry" requires hoardes of "consumers," many, if not most, are willing to follow the leader right into the political agenda of the religious right. Add their singular ability to "network" with each other, and no wonder their "cross-marketing" has made them such a political force in this country.</p>
<p>I'm not begrudging any of it, although I find their "brand" of Christianity and Politics entirely repugnant. In fact, given the enormous financial success of this "model," why are not others imitating it? Create a "package," follow the mega-church model, and you'll be financially/politically set for life. It's Wal-mart ala religion with some very entrepreneurial pastors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommykey</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4630</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommykey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4630</guid>
		<description>Well, I work here in NYC, and I can tell you that the bomb went off and destroyed the UN 5 minutes ago.  You should be hearing about it in the news any minute now.  

NOT!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I work here in NYC, and I can tell you that the bomb went off and destroyed the UN 5 minutes ago.  You should be hearing about it in the news any minute now.  </p>
<p>NOT!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeirM</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4619</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeirM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 05:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4619</guid>
		<description>These people are absolutely staggering!  They&#039;ve already updated their site:

&quot;The UN in Midtown Manhattan will be hit by a sea borne nuclear bomb on 2006Ab3/4 i.e. between Sundown Sunday July 30th and Sundown Tuesday August 1st, 2006&quot;

I can just see it now.  The date is June 1st, 2112.  A nuclear bomb has just leveled a major portion of Manhattan.  You go to the True Bible Code site.  It reads, &quot;See, we told ya!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These people are absolutely staggering!  They've already updated their site:</p>
<p>"The UN in Midtown Manhattan will be hit by a sea borne nuclear bomb on 2006Ab3/4 i.e. between Sundown Sunday July 30th and Sundown Tuesday August 1st, 2006"</p>
<p>I can just see it now.  The date is June 1st, 2112.  A nuclear bomb has just leveled a major portion of Manhattan.  You go to the True Bible Code site.  It reads, "See, we told ya!"</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebonmuse</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4616</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4616</guid>
		<description>Hey, it&#039;s 11 PM Eastern Standard Time. They&#039;ve still got another hour. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it's 11 PM Eastern Standard Time. They've still got another hour. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Void</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4612</link>
		<dc:creator>Void</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 01:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4612</guid>
		<description>Looks like they made another mistake, well at least they&#039;re keeping track of their ad hoc hypothesis&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they made another mistake, well at least they're keeping track of their ad hoc hypothesis'</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignoramus</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4594</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignoramus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4594</guid>
		<description>So have the creationist pastors started to encourage their flocks to read Dawkins, then? It would seem to be logical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So have the creationist pastors started to encourage their flocks to read Dawkins, then? It would seem to be logical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4586</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4586</guid>
		<description>Of course, it is an excellent thing to argue for evolution and against biblical literalism. Evolution clearly contradicts certain passages of Scripture, well and good.

Equally clearly, Evolution does not prove atheism. There is a certain danger if one argues that it does, firstly that one will give a false impression, and secondly that theists who cannot bring themselves to embrace atheism will instead abandon evolution. This danger is a mirror image of the danger of arguing that theism disproves evolution, which firstly gives a false impression and secondly may cause believers in evolution to abandon theism.

Of course the second result would probably be seen as good by most of this forum&#039;s users. Still, I think we should try not to convert people to our views by trickery. An opinion that I regret to say has not been put into practise by all Christians down the ages!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it is an excellent thing to argue for evolution and against biblical literalism. Evolution clearly contradicts certain passages of Scripture, well and good.</p>
<p>Equally clearly, Evolution does not prove atheism. There is a certain danger if one argues that it does, firstly that one will give a false impression, and secondly that theists who cannot bring themselves to embrace atheism will instead abandon evolution. This danger is a mirror image of the danger of arguing that theism disproves evolution, which firstly gives a false impression and secondly may cause believers in evolution to abandon theism.</p>
<p>Of course the second result would probably be seen as good by most of this forum's users. Still, I think we should try not to convert people to our views by trickery. An opinion that I regret to say has not been put into practise by all Christians down the ages!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will E.</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4564</link>
		<dc:creator>Will E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 19:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4564</guid>
		<description>&quot;Follow that logic through and soon we&#039;ll be hearing that scientists must not defend science at all lest they persuade more people to forsake it for religion.&quot;

Precisely. When I argue for atheism, I always get, &quot;You sound as bad as a fundamentalist fire and brimstone preacher!&quot; WTF? I guess I&#039;m not supposed to even care--or know anything about--religion, lest I be branded as crazy as they are. As soon as the atheist ventures his opinion, everyone thinks he&#039;s secretly religious, else why would he care? I know Dawkins gets this as well. Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Follow that logic through and soon we'll be hearing that scientists must not defend science at all lest they persuade more people to forsake it for religion."</p>
<p>Precisely. When I argue for atheism, I always get, "You sound as bad as a fundamentalist fire and brimstone preacher!" WTF? I guess I'm not supposed to even care--or know anything about--religion, lest I be branded as crazy as they are. As soon as the atheist ventures his opinion, everyone thinks he's secretly religious, else why would he care? I know Dawkins gets this as well. Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpeirM</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4556</link>
		<dc:creator>SpeirM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4556</guid>
		<description>&quot;In my book, this gets them high marks for honesty.&quot;

Bosh!  In my book, they&#039;ll get *some* marks for honesty with they abandon this foolishness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"In my book, this gets them high marks for honesty."</p>
<p>Bosh!  In my book, they'll get *some* marks for honesty with they abandon this foolishness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4552</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/watch-this-space.html#comment-4552</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true that the True Bible Decoders are a fun bunch. I&#039;ve been tracking and commenting on their prediction of the imminent destruction of the U.N. plaza on my own blog for awhile now. I&#039;d forgotten their latest guess was about to come due. Time for another update it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's true that the True Bible Decoders are a fun bunch. I've been tracking and commenting on their prediction of the imminent destruction of the U.N. plaza on my own blog for awhile now. I'd forgotten their latest guess was about to come due. Time for another update it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

