Comments on: Kent Hovind Is Sentenced http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION. Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:09:52 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Ebonmuse http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15660 Ebonmuse Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:04:54 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15660 I think it's long past time to close the comments on this thread. I think it's long past time to close the comments on this thread.

]]> By: peter http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15578 peter Sun, 18 Feb 2007 06:40:21 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15578 Real Americans are Toll Road,Income,SS and MC tax Proester. Chistians get of your rocking chair and Fight Real Americans are
Toll Road,Income,SS and MC tax Proester.
Chistians get of your rocking chair and Fight

]]> By: Carlos http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15454 Carlos Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:49:33 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15454 You are trying to sound intelligent that is good...keep it up maybe someone will think your smart...you obviously know the commentmaster,and obviously are reading our comments(did you like them?) "Fool"a charitable interpretation?lol you crack me up!!!!I love it Fool is worse than anything I said on my comments...(ellipses I love'em) I think I did prove my point,and its scary to you!! I will read one last comment and then I'm done-thanks for your time. I won't forget you You are trying to sound intelligent that is good...keep it up maybe someone will think your smart...you obviously know the commentmaster,and obviously are reading our comments(did you like them?)
"Fool"a charitable interpretation?lol you crack me up!!!!I love it

Fool is worse than anything I said on my comments...(ellipses I love'em)

I think I did prove my point,and its scary to you!!
I will read one last comment and then I'm done-thanks for your time.

I won't forget you

]]> By: Alex Weaver http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15447 Alex Weaver Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:21:59 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15447 <blockquote>I am clearly a fool Alex says(insult)</blockquote> As distinguished from being deliberately deceitful. Would you disagree that "fool" is a more charitable interpretation of your hostile, ignorant commentary? Incidentally, I don't have the capacity to delete comments (not "blogs"). Thank you for proving my point here.

I am clearly a fool Alex says(insult)

As distinguished from being deliberately deceitful. Would you disagree that "fool" is a more charitable interpretation of your hostile, ignorant commentary?

Incidentally, I don't have the capacity to delete comments (not "blogs"). Thank you for proving my point here.

]]> By: Carlos http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15446 Carlos Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:19:52 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15446 Alot of insults on this blog...I really think we got Alex with the blogs he erased thats why he deleted them only minutes after we wrote them-so noone can see. What are you afraid of Alex or Adam?Let everyone see-I think we got ya. Alot of insults on this blog...I really think we got Alex with the blogs he erased thats why he deleted them only minutes after we wrote them-so noone can see.
What are you afraid of Alex or Adam?Let everyone see-I think we got ya.

]]> By: Carlos http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15442 Carlos Sat, 17 Feb 2007 16:12:47 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15442 I am clearly a fool Alex says(insult) I am clearly a fool Alex says(insult)

]]> By: freddy http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15297 freddy Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:48:29 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15297 Hey Alex, Ask Adam if he would be so kind as to let you read my blogs,they are quite fun and educational. Are you an English teacher?And if so does that mean you are a further evolved ape? I admit I was personal towards you,because it seems you are blasting everyone who believes in God. There are alot of attacks by you on intellegence,do you feel smart now?I am amazed on how fast you shut down my blogs as if you are sitting by your computer waiting for someone to defend Kent Hovind or God in any way,and then attacking them. How many good points have been deleted,(A sizable number?)I don't see you abiding by your own rules.I believe you are filtering the blogs to suit your agenda. Anyway,there is the elect and and "non"elect,it appears you prefer the lather. My grammar better?I didn't use the"...."ellipses I hope that helps Hey Alex,

Ask Adam if he would be so kind as to let you read my blogs,they are quite fun and educational.
Are you an English teacher?And if so does that mean you are a further evolved ape?
I admit I was personal towards you,because it seems you are blasting everyone who believes in God.
There are alot of attacks by you on intellegence,do you feel smart now?I am amazed on how fast you shut down my blogs as if you are sitting by your computer waiting for someone to defend Kent Hovind or God in any way,and then attacking them.
How many good points have been deleted,(A sizable number?)I don't see you abiding by your own rules.I believe you are filtering the blogs to suit your agenda.
Anyway,there is the elect and and "non"elect,it appears you prefer the lather.

My grammar better?I didn't use the"...."ellipses
I hope that helps

]]> By: Alex Weaver http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15288 Alex Weaver Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:12:31 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15288 As for "insulting you on your grammar," it was a criticism of the presentation of your argument, not of your character. I suggest you learn the difference. And it's true; very poor grammar gives most people an impression that the writer is uneducated, and distracts readers from the logic of the argument. Consult any competent English teacher, most competent teachers of any sort, and the introductory chapter of almost any standard writing reference. (For the record, the gross overuse of ellipses (...) is particularly annoying.) As for "insulting you on your grammar," it was a criticism of the presentation of your argument, not of your character. I suggest you learn the difference. And it's true; very poor grammar gives most people an impression that the writer is uneducated, and distracts readers from the logic of the argument. Consult any competent English teacher, most competent teachers of any sort, and the introductory chapter of almost any standard writing reference. (For the record, the gross overuse of ellipses (...) is particularly annoying.)

]]> By: Alex Weaver http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15287 Alex Weaver Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:07:29 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15287 Oddly, there are a sizable number of comments from Christians that are left up. Oddly, the ones deleted seem, based on my observation of the ones that subsequently disappear, to be from people who either refuse to abide by basic rules of civility or refuse to substantiate their one-liners or offer a substantive argument. I'm not entirely sure when Adam stopped giving warnings for the former category; if there was an announcement I've missed it. Adam, perhaps it would be worthwhile to add a prominent "commenting policy" somewhere closer to the top? Oddly, there are a sizable number of comments from Christians that are left up. Oddly, the ones deleted seem, based on my observation of the ones that subsequently disappear, to be from people who either refuse to abide by basic rules of civility or refuse to substantiate their one-liners or offer a substantive argument. I'm not entirely sure when Adam stopped giving warnings for the former category; if there was an announcement I've missed it. Adam, perhaps it would be worthwhile to add a prominent "commenting policy" somewhere closer to the top?

]]> By: freddy http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15269 freddy Sat, 17 Feb 2007 02:13:27 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15269 The blog master has removed comments that I believe everyone should read..because its ok to blast Kent Hovind but noone else...I was personally insulted with my grammar but that was acceptable...I'm not gonna blast anyone personally again other than God's judgement is on your heads...you can erase this-its cool,but God knows what your doing...you're blocking your own medicine..I see alot of insults against anyone religious on this site and that is one-sided and wrong. I hope that anyone religious or God fearing does not write anymore on this site because you are wasting your time...this site obviously is anti-God and they are loving the chance to bash christians. The blog master has removed comments that I believe everyone should read..because its ok to blast Kent Hovind but noone else...I was personally insulted with my grammar but that was acceptable...I'm not gonna blast anyone personally again other than God's judgement is on your heads...you can erase this-its cool,but God knows what your doing...you're blocking your own medicine..I see alot of insults against anyone religious on this site and that is one-sided and wrong.
I hope that anyone religious or God fearing does not write anymore on this site because you are wasting your time...this site obviously is anti-God and they are loving the chance to bash christians.

]]> By: Ebonmuse http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15264 Ebonmuse Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:55:19 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15264 Since I've already had to remove several comments, let me be clear: Comments containing insults and personal attacks will be deleted without warning, as per this site's comment policy. Criticism of other people's beliefs is acceptable; ad hominem attacks are not. Since I've already had to remove several comments, let me be clear: Comments containing insults and personal attacks will be deleted without warning, as per this site's comment policy. Criticism of other people's beliefs is acceptable; ad hominem attacks are not.

]]> By: Polly http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15225 Polly Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:01:03 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/01/kent-hovind-is-sentenced.html#comment-15225 It's possible that some on this blog may be from other countries and English may not be their native tongue. Anyway, I know it's probably too late, but I really wanted to respond to Marcus: You talk about the hate here. I think you may be suffering from some kind of memory loss. Perhaps, if the VERY FIRST words on your post weren't an insult ref:"You brood of vipers...JC was right about you" you would have received a less caustic response from your audience. Note that John the Baptist (not JC) was speaking to the religious leaders of his time. Also, the fact that you consistenly and purposely antagonize everyone here by inappropriately, and incorrectly, labeling evolution a religion doesn't lend any credibility to your self-assigned righteousness. Add to that, the fact that you "Now [I] know how Jonah felt towards Ninevah when God chose to forgive them!" betrays a striking vindictiveness that even the God of the OT, in this one (very rare) instance was teaching against. I am shocked at the inconsistency in your character. If this were a creationist website, I would think that an atheist may have planted such an incoherent diatribe to make Xians look bad, but this is an atheist blog, so such a stunt would only be preaching to the choir. Although I've been neck deep in Xian fundamentalism virtually all my life until recently, I never held or encountered this attitude except for the weirdos at the Rose Parade holding signs stating that "God hates gays." But, even my Xian friends don't agree with that tactic or that God actually HATES anyone, though they do call it a sin and believe in Hell - hence the "fun" of fundamentalism. I think he meant "Lucy" the fossil since he said, "first of all why would I "accuse" you of being a Satan worshipper if you are truly athiestic" Surprisingly, he understood THAT much. I think it was talk.origins that refuted almost 3 dozen of Hovind's "arguments" for a young-Earth. I spent a good amount of time reading the material on that site. Matt R. - please keep reading and keep an open mind. The only guard against bias is to read both sides of every story - both FOR evoution and FOR Creationism and the "anti-" literature of both. Be true to your own reasoning powers. It's possible that some on this blog may be from other countries and English may not be their native tongue.

Anyway, I know it's probably too late, but I really wanted to respond to Marcus:
You talk about the hate here. I think you may be suffering from some kind of memory loss. Perhaps, if the VERY FIRST words on your post weren't an insult ref:"You brood of vipers...JC was right about you" you would have received a less caustic response from your audience. Note that John the Baptist (not JC) was speaking to the religious leaders of his time. Also, the fact that you consistenly and purposely antagonize everyone here by inappropriately, and incorrectly, labeling evolution a religion doesn't lend any credibility to your self-assigned righteousness. Add to that, the fact that you "Now [I] know how Jonah felt towards Ninevah when God chose to forgive them!" betrays a striking vindictiveness that even the God of the OT, in this one (very rare) instance was teaching against. I am shocked at the inconsistency in your character. If this were a creationist website, I would think that an atheist may have planted such an incoherent diatribe to make Xians look bad, but this is an atheist blog, so such a stunt would only be preaching to the choir.
Although I've been neck deep in Xian fundamentalism virtually all my life until recently, I never held or encountered this attitude except for the weirdos at the Rose Parade holding signs stating that "God hates gays." But, even my Xian friends don't agree with that tactic or that God actually HATES anyone, though they do call it a sin and believe in Hell - hence the "fun" of fundamentalism.

I think he meant "Lucy" the fossil since he said, "first of all why would I "accuse" you of being a Satan worshipper if you are truly athiestic" Surprisingly, he understood THAT much.

I think it was talk.origins that refuted almost 3 dozen of Hovind's "arguments" for a young-Earth. I spent a good amount of time reading the material on that site.

Matt R. - please keep reading and keep an open mind. The only guard against bias is to read both sides of every story - both FOR evoution and FOR Creationism and the "anti-" literature of both. Be true to your own reasoning powers.

]]>