we, who is we, as in we of this modern wolrd, who are taught/told brainwashed into this society.

as to your question, "wouldnt we be encouraging their advocates", if it has a financial gain for some big oil company or the equivalant yes, if not no, nothing is being done in this day n age without it being of profit,

shouldnt it be more for the good of nature not just mankind but all,

we all have to gain more profits every year either by staff cuts or higher sales
sooner or later we will all be back in 1890s with a industrial revolution, just because the big man wants more,

how does a new age start...

another one with negativity,, carritas has estimated the iraq war at 230 million dollars this could have been put to a lot better use in the third world countries or New Orleans like places,, but go on have a pun at my grammer and punctuation,,

If we were opposed to the general ideas you're attempting to advance (social justice, etc.) wouldn't we be encouraging their advocates to employ this level of stylistic and mechanical competence?

the last i need to know is capitalization, punctuation, and avoidance of run-on sentences òr grammatical rules

What you're really saying is that your time is more important than that of all the people who have to spend THEIR time trying to make sense of your illiterate ramblings!

preaching to the choir is a bit harsh, but if u have read books on van helsing then maybe you see life a bit different I have always felt that there is a system out there that is only maintained for the rich n well educated oxford harvard n not the individual, after reading Jan van Helsings books it seems to make more sense,especially if your from n old old family of wealth..

as in overthrowing,revolution talk there is no way that is ever going to happen,as todays society media driven whatever will not go for that, a lot of people are brainwashed, by the hype of being able to do/earn more n by the time you realise it you have kids to provide for and to give them a better education so they know where to put full stops n commas into their sentences, because thats whats more important than the person themselve, how you look what u do what u say what your job is how much u earn what your political view is right or leftwing,,what u drive,, all these are more important to people these day (or most people)...I dont like putting a country to my origin as i am from neither here or there as in typical for those countries but I abode in middle/south europe, the last i need to know is capitalization, punctuation, and avoidance of run-on sentences òr grammatical rules, what im realy interested in, is the person, cultures amazing how different they r being european asian american whateverbut when it comes to wellbeing of the family we all have the same in common well almost all,

me being new in my thoughts or ways no i dont think so!!!!

communism is not the way but neither is the western way, thats my point of view and we are all entitled to them..

all the best n have a good un

I'm an engineering technician making about the national average income and supporting a family of three on it.

I'm curious as to what mother tongue you speak, since capitalization, punctuation, and avoidance of run-on sentences don't seem to be part of its grammatical rules.

Hurricances, earthquakes, and other natural disasters constitute a significant fraction of "all society's troubles."

As for communism, it's a perfect example of how overthrowing the ruling elites--which seems likely, but may not, be what you're trying to argue for--does not automatically lead to an improvement for the people of a given society. If you've got a better proposal for how to go about a revolution in order to prevent it from being hijacked the same way the communist revolutions were, by all means, share. On the other hand, if you're merely advocating establishment of greater social justice within the existing system, why are you preaching to the choir while broadcasting the strong impression that you think you're saying something new and profound?

ever heard of jan van helsing,we are as my name is all what the big n rich wish us to be the slaves of todays society so that they can live a life of riches n wealth,,they do it so not to name themselves as pharoa/ceaser or kaisers for this would bring uproar but as a normal business man/woman while the rest of us slave to be bale to afford our nice little appartments or houses just enough so we have to slave on for the next pay check,no i dont have anything against work as a matter of fact I like the achievement of it,this world would be free of all its troubles if the Directors would come down n the slaves of society could go up,

Really? I'll be the first to argue that a more equitable and consistent distribution of wealth would go a long way towards relieving society's problems, but how on earth is eliminating the upper class going to prevent hurricanes or earthquakes, say?

Second, the experiment where "the Directors come down n the slaves of society could go up" has been tried in many countries around the world in the form of Communism and, at least in your naive formulation, failed miserably, since it simply produced a new batch of Directors even worse than the last. Clearly more is required to make society function and fulfill the needs of all its members than simply bringing the mighty low.

Third, may I politely suggest you read up a bit on basic grammar if you want your arguments to be taken seriously?