<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  1 Dec 2008 16:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Petrucio</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24629</link>
		<dc:creator>Petrucio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24629</guid>
		<description>This is only my second or third comment, but you may remember me from an email I sent you earlier. I still haven't finished reading all the essays, but I definetely still intent to keep what I promised, and I sure wouldn't mind taking a peek at your chapters too. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only my second or third comment, but you may remember me from an email I sent you earlier. I still haven't finished reading all the essays, but I definetely still intent to keep what I promised, and I sure wouldn't mind taking a peek at your chapters too. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mollie</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24558</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24558</guid>
		<description>ok- thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok- thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebonmuse</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24548</guid>
		<description>This isn't the appropriate thread, but I'll create an open thread to discuss this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn't the appropriate thread, but I'll create an open thread to discuss this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mollie</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24545</link>
		<dc:creator>Mollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24545</guid>
		<description>I've only been familiar with your site for a few days, so I'm not sure if this is the right place to discuss what I'm about to say. If not, please direct me to a more appropriate place.

My husband thinks it's a bad idea to debate with you guys because we come from two totally different backgrounds of thought- I believe that God exists and that the Bible is totally true and you do not. Therefore, you will not convice me of anything and I will not convice you of anything.

Nevertheless, I can't help but ask the following questions- I don't really want to get in a huge discussion over this either, but we'll see what happens. In your essay above, you give the following: 
&lt;blockquote&gt; Assumption (1): God exists.
        Assumption (1a): God is all-knowing.
        Assumption (1b): God is all-powerful.
        Assumption (1c): God is perfectly loving.
        Assumption (1d): Any being that did not possess all three of the above properties would not be God.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
How did you come to the conclusion that God only has these three qualities, or that these three are the ultimate? I can think of his holiness and justice that would slightly alter the equation.

I do not say this to be offensive, but is seems like you have built up 'your idea' of what God is or who He should be and then proved how he cannot be (rather than taking all he has revealed Himself to be in the Bible) . 

Again- this is where the fundamental differences come into play. I believe that God HAS revealed himself in the Bible, so if you don't take the  Bible at face value- as it says it is- the Word of God, then it will be hard for me to 'argue' anything with you. I have come to the understanding that without God telling us about himself, through the Bible, we really wouldn't be able to know much about him. So again, I ask, since you don't believe in the Bible- where do you get your idea of what the 'perfect God' should be like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've only been familiar with your site for a few days, so I'm not sure if this is the right place to discuss what I'm about to say. If not, please direct me to a more appropriate place.</p>
<p>My husband thinks it's a bad idea to debate with you guys because we come from two totally different backgrounds of thought- I believe that God exists and that the Bible is totally true and you do not. Therefore, you will not convice me of anything and I will not convice you of anything.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I can't help but ask the following questions- I don't really want to get in a huge discussion over this either, but we'll see what happens. In your essay above, you give the following: </p>
<blockquote><p> Assumption (1): God exists.<br />
        Assumption (1a): God is all-knowing.<br />
        Assumption (1b): God is all-powerful.<br />
        Assumption (1c): God is perfectly loving.<br />
        Assumption (1d): Any being that did not possess all three of the above properties would not be God.</p></blockquote>
<p>How did you come to the conclusion that God only has these three qualities, or that these three are the ultimate? I can think of his holiness and justice that would slightly alter the equation.</p>
<p>I do not say this to be offensive, but is seems like you have built up 'your idea' of what God is or who He should be and then proved how he cannot be (rather than taking all he has revealed Himself to be in the Bible) . </p>
<p>Again- this is where the fundamental differences come into play. I believe that God HAS revealed himself in the Bible, so if you don't take the  Bible at face value- as it says it is- the Word of God, then it will be hard for me to 'argue' anything with you. I have come to the understanding that without God telling us about himself, through the Bible, we really wouldn't be able to know much about him. So again, I ask, since you don't believe in the Bible- where do you get your idea of what the 'perfect God' should be like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24537</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 12:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24537</guid>
		<description>Adam, I'd like to read and comment.  I'm a professor of English and writing at a Community College on the East Coast and my MA is in philosophy, so I might be able to give you some useful feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, I'd like to read and comment.  I'm a professor of English and writing at a Community College on the East Coast and my MA is in philosophy, so I might be able to give you some useful feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff T.</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24527</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24527</guid>
		<description>Adam,
When you are done, I want an autographed copy.  I will keep it on display in my library.  You are a gifted writer and are fighting the good fight against impossible odds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,<br />
When you are done, I want an autographed copy.  I will keep it on display in my library.  You are a gifted writer and are fighting the good fight against impossible odds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24512</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24512</guid>
		<description>Although I think I've been a regular commenter, at least, for the past 5 months (almost as long as I've been an official atheist), I'll wait it out and simply read the completed work in the bookstore...uh, er, I mean BUY a copy like any normal person. :)
 I don't feel I'm qualified to comment on the topic, yet. I haven't read anyone else: Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, etc. In fact, if you get published soon, you may be the first Atheist writer/author that I read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I think I've been a regular commenter, at least, for the past 5 months (almost as long as I've been an official atheist), I'll wait it out and simply read the completed work in the bookstore...uh, er, I mean BUY a copy like any normal person. :)<br />
 I don't feel I'm qualified to comment on the topic, yet. I haven't read anyone else: Dawkins, Hitchens, Harris, etc. In fact, if you get published soon, you may be the first Atheist writer/author that I read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Aardvark</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24510</link>
		<dc:creator>King Aardvark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24510</guid>
		<description>I would like to be a regular commenter and get a preview of the book chapters, but most of the time I'm so thoroughly impressed with your posts that I have nothing at all to add.  I wouldn't do a good job of providing feedback for the book either.

I'll just be happy to read it when you're done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to be a regular commenter and get a preview of the book chapters, but most of the time I'm so thoroughly impressed with your posts that I have nothing at all to add.  I wouldn't do a good job of providing feedback for the book either.</p>
<p>I'll just be happy to read it when you're done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XanderG</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24492</link>
		<dc:creator>XanderG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24492</guid>
		<description>I'm extremely interested in reading your book. If it's anything like the essasys on the Atheism Pages, I'm sure it'll be great. However, I don't think I could be counted as a regular commenter yet, so I guess I'd better start commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm extremely interested in reading your book. If it's anything like the essasys on the Atheism Pages, I'm sure it'll be great. However, I don't think I could be counted as a regular commenter yet, so I guess I'd better start commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24480</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/06/book-update-4.html#comment-24480</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Good way to bribe the regulars. However, I wonder if you wouldn't be better off convincing all readers that they are sinners and that the path to salvation lies in commenting regularly on your blog. For some strange reason, I think this would work rather well.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

On the contrary, it would be like pitching Avon samples in a stereotypical sports bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Good way to bribe the regulars. However, I wonder if you wouldn't be better off convincing all readers that they are sinners and that the path to salvation lies in commenting regularly on your blog. For some strange reason, I think this would work rather well.</p></blockquote>
<p>On the contrary, it would be like pitching Avon samples in a stereotypical sports bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
