<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: February 2008 Science Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:09:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32041</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32041</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;At this rate, God will soon have nowhere to hide!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is always the Grand Canyon. Perhaps he carved it with the flood for that purpose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>At this rate, God will soon have nowhere to hide!</p></blockquote>
<p>There is always the Grand Canyon. Perhaps he carved it with the flood for that purpose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bassmanpete</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32040</link>
		<dc:creator>bassmanpete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32040</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The &quot;no transitional fossil&quot; argument is the most common one I hear. Now I have more transitional fossils to cite.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, the gaps are getting smaller. At this rate, God will soon have nowhere to hide!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The "no transitional fossil" argument is the most common one I hear. Now I have more transitional fossils to cite.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, the gaps are getting smaller. At this rate, God will soon have nowhere to hide!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Madewell</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32032</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Madewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32032</guid>
		<description>I hope some of those pesky little YECs are reading about all those non-existant transitional fossils that keep getting discovered. For some reason when I want to debate atheism/theism, the discussion usually deteriorates into an evolution argument. The &quot;no transitional fossil&quot; argument is the most common one I hear. Now I have more transitional fossils to cite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope some of those pesky little YECs are reading about all those non-existant transitional fossils that keep getting discovered. For some reason when I want to debate atheism/theism, the discussion usually deteriorates into an evolution argument. The "no transitional fossil" argument is the most common one I hear. Now I have more transitional fossils to cite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ridger</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32024</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ridger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32024</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Sun is big -&quot;
&quot;The Sun is so big that, if it were hollow, a million Earths would fit inside, and yet - it is only ... a middle-sized star!&quot;

The Sun is a Mass of Incandescent Gas - They Might Be Giants</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The Sun is big -"<br />
"The Sun is so big that, if it were hollow, a million Earths would fit inside, and yet - it is only ... a middle-sized star!"</p>
<p>The Sun is a Mass of Incandescent Gas - They Might Be Giants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Skinner</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32007</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32007</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bov9M2gEgcE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eH3GH7Pn_eA

Since the piece was about astronomy I think the first video is rather apprpriate (The Sun is big, but only compared to Earth). The second is random and rather humorous, but both of them will give you a sense of scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bov9M2gEgcE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bov9M2gEgcE</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eH3GH7Pn_eA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eH3GH7Pn_eA</a></p>
<p>Since the piece was about astronomy I think the first video is rather apprpriate (The Sun is big, but only compared to Earth). The second is random and rather humorous, but both of them will give you a sense of scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32004</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32004</guid>
		<description>You might want to explain that 1 AU is roughly the distance from the earth to the sun, so that people have a better sense of the scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to explain that 1 AU is roughly the distance from the earth to the sun, so that people have a better sense of the scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32003</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-32003</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What I loved best about this discovery is that it was assisted by two amateur New Zealand astronomers, Jennie McCormick and Grant Christie, using 10-inch telescopes in backyard observatories. Even in this age of multibillion-dollar particle accelerators and space telescopes, I find it greatly inspiring that even a non-professional can still contribute to groundbreaking scientific discoveries.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Another feild where this is relatively common is paleontology. But, of course, astronomy is capable of being done from the comforts of your house. 

It is cool that there are still a few sciences in which ametuers can participate without having any formal training.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What I loved best about this discovery is that it was assisted by two amateur New Zealand astronomers, Jennie McCormick and Grant Christie, using 10-inch telescopes in backyard observatories. Even in this age of multibillion-dollar particle accelerators and space telescopes, I find it greatly inspiring that even a non-professional can still contribute to groundbreaking scientific discoveries.</p></blockquote>
<p>Another feild where this is relatively common is paleontology. But, of course, astronomy is capable of being done from the comforts of your house. </p>
<p>It is cool that there are still a few sciences in which ametuers can participate without having any formal training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2-D Man</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-31997</link>
		<dc:creator>2-D Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-31997</guid>
		<description>Just to clear up a point about the first item, 1 AU is also the &quot;radius&quot; of the earth&#039;s orbit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clear up a point about the first item, 1 AU is also the "radius" of the earth's orbit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Aardvark</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-31984</link>
		<dc:creator>King Aardvark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-31984</guid>
		<description>But why are there PYGMIES + DWARVES?!!  

With that out of the way, glad you&#039;re enjoying Carl Zimmer.  My favourite science blogger for a while now.  I&#039;ve bought most of his books, though I&#039;ve only read one since I keep loaning them out and haven&#039;t gotten them back yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But why are there PYGMIES + DWARVES?!!  </p>
<p>With that out of the way, glad you're enjoying Carl Zimmer.  My favourite science blogger for a while now.  I've bought most of his books, though I've only read one since I keep loaning them out and haven't gotten them back yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the chaplain</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-31980</link>
		<dc:creator>the chaplain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/02/february-2008-science-updates.html#comment-31980</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Even in this age of multibillion-dollar particle accelerators and space telescopes, I find it greatly inspiring that even a non-professional can still contribute to groundbreaking scientific discoveries.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is inspiring. Western society is so fixed on credentials and professional status that it&#039;s easy to forget that today&#039;s hobbyists and amateurs are far better educated and more intellectually sophisticated than many &quot;professionals&quot; were a century ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Even in this age of multibillion-dollar particle accelerators and space telescopes, I find it greatly inspiring that even a non-professional can still contribute to groundbreaking scientific discoveries.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is inspiring. Western society is so fixed on credentials and professional status that it's easy to forget that today's hobbyists and amateurs are far better educated and more intellectually sophisticated than many "professionals" were a century ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

