<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Medved: Clueless Dominionist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Gary Silvia</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-36737</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Silvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 16:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-36737</guid>
		<description>Hi all, just ran across this forum, have some thoughts to share.

First I have stopped referring to Christians, Jews and Muslim as such, to me they are all followers of Abraham (the bible), they are in my opinion, are to be called Abrahamics. They follow the same plan, domination at all cost, their story ends the same, with the utter destruction of the planet and all mankind (end days). Abrahamism is a doomsday cult; theirs is a blood god that demands sacrifice. The main concern of Abrahamics is personal salvation of the immortal soul, not world peace or harmony.

There are many types of theologies out there, many concerned with more altruistic ideals. What of the theist who is not Abrahamic, the Deist, theocifer, Hindu, Native American Shaman and Buddhist. I would love to see some more Buddhist candidates, not actually theist more complicated than "big daddy", but main concern is the cessation of all suffering, compassion the highest ideal. 

I have been wondering lately what it means to be an American, is it a matter of geography, or is it an ideal materialized in the constitution, a way to view all humanity, a set of ethics and ideals that when applied to society can foster pluralism and prosperity for all. What if we could stand bravely in defense of the rights of others even if we find their habits offense to our individual sensibilities, to protect the freedom we have by protecting the freedom of humanity to express itself. If we could see the glory and benefit of our diversity, we as a species can accomplish many wondrous things if we can ever embrace or interdependence. Imagine if we could view our diversity as an ever widening net to catch the bounty the universe has to offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, just ran across this forum, have some thoughts to share.</p>
<p>First I have stopped referring to Christians, Jews and Muslim as such, to me they are all followers of Abraham (the bible), they are in my opinion, are to be called Abrahamics. They follow the same plan, domination at all cost, their story ends the same, with the utter destruction of the planet and all mankind (end days). Abrahamism is a doomsday cult; theirs is a blood god that demands sacrifice. The main concern of Abrahamics is personal salvation of the immortal soul, not world peace or harmony.</p>
<p>There are many types of theologies out there, many concerned with more altruistic ideals. What of the theist who is not Abrahamic, the Deist, theocifer, Hindu, Native American Shaman and Buddhist. I would love to see some more Buddhist candidates, not actually theist more complicated than "big daddy", but main concern is the cessation of all suffering, compassion the highest ideal. </p>
<p>I have been wondering lately what it means to be an American, is it a matter of geography, or is it an ideal materialized in the constitution, a way to view all humanity, a set of ethics and ideals that when applied to society can foster pluralism and prosperity for all. What if we could stand bravely in defense of the rights of others even if we find their habits offense to our individual sensibilities, to protect the freedom we have by protecting the freedom of humanity to express itself. If we could see the glory and benefit of our diversity, we as a species can accomplish many wondrous things if we can ever embrace or interdependence. Imagine if we could view our diversity as an ever widening net to catch the bounty the universe has to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Dunwoody</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34491</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Dunwoody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 04:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34491</guid>
		<description>Very well said. Not so much for the unfortunate Mr. Medved, and I doubt I'll measure up but: from one Christian to another, I implore you, Michael - read a friggin' history book that was published in the last ten years, then re-read your Bible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said. Not so much for the unfortunate Mr. Medved, and I doubt I'll measure up but: from one Christian to another, I implore you, Michael - read a friggin' history book that was published in the last ten years, then re-read your Bible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goyo</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34359</link>
		<dc:creator>goyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34359</guid>
		<description>Hair tonic: 
Actually the bible does say that god favors the nation of Israel. 
And most Protestant churches still brag that god will favor those nations who befriend Israel. Hence, our continual support of the country by churches here in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hair tonic:<br />
Actually the bible does say that god favors the nation of Israel.<br />
And most Protestant churches still brag that god will favor those nations who befriend Israel. Hence, our continual support of the country by churches here in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HairTonic</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34261</link>
		<dc:creator>HairTonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34261</guid>
		<description>Some religious Americans have a belief that God is overlooking and supporting their country. Some even go as far to call America a Christian country,neglecting the atheist population. This attitude is arrogant and has provoked the ire of people the world over, epsecially when they go and trumpet to other about how God is overlooking them(Manifest Destiny, anyone?). According to the Bible, God, if he exists loves all humans. He dosen't support any particular nation whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some religious Americans have a belief that God is overlooking and supporting their country. Some even go as far to call America a Christian country,neglecting the atheist population. This attitude is arrogant and has provoked the ire of people the world over, epsecially when they go and trumpet to other about how God is overlooking them(Manifest Destiny, anyone?). According to the Bible, God, if he exists loves all humans. He dosen't support any particular nation whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommykey</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34240</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommykey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 01:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34240</guid>
		<description>It made me think, a campaign to remove "under God" from the Pledge should be called the "Restore the Pledge" campaign, because it would put it right out there that the purpose of the campaign is to restore the pledge to what it was BEFORE they added "under God."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It made me think, a campaign to remove "under God" from the Pledge should be called the "Restore the Pledge" campaign, because it would put it right out there that the purpose of the campaign is to restore the pledge to what it was BEFORE they added "under God."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MisterDomino</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34237</link>
		<dc:creator>MisterDomino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34237</guid>
		<description>I can't believe no one posted this earlier:

&lt;a href="" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utkBu-mqi-c&lt;/a&gt;

This is the old Warner Bros. cartoon "Old Glory," with a very cute Porky Pig trying to learn the American Pledge of Allegiance.  However, the cartoon was made in 1939, fifteen years before "under God" was inserted into the wording.

@ terrence:

&lt;blockquote&gt;See what you can learn if you just keep an open mind?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think he's so open-minded that his brain fell out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't believe no one posted this earlier:</p>
<p><a href="" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utkBu-mqi-c</a></p>
<p>This is the old Warner Bros. cartoon "Old Glory," with a very cute Porky Pig trying to learn the American Pledge of Allegiance.  However, the cartoon was made in 1939, fifteen years before "under God" was inserted into the wording.</p>
<p>@ terrence:</p>
<blockquote><p>See what you can learn if you just keep an open mind?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think he's so open-minded that his brain fell out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikespeir</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34214</link>
		<dc:creator>mikespeir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34214</guid>
		<description>"I think they'd figure out in a hurry what the 1st Amendment was for, and why religon + government = really bad idea."

Yep.  I live in Texas.  I've sometimes tried to imagine what would happen here is the Christians had their unrestrained way with the government.  At first they'd all be giving each other high fives for their conquest.  Oh sure, atheists, Satanists, and Muslims would be in trouble from the get-go.  But who cares about them?  After a while Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses would start feeling the heat.  Mainline, "backslidden" denominations like the Methodists and Presbyterians would come next.  Before long the Seventh Day Adventists would be blacklisted, followed quickly by the United Pentecostals and the Church of Christ.  More "orthodox" Pentecostals like the Assemblies of God and Church of God would last longer, but would ultimately succumb before the awesome might of the Brobdingnagian Southern Baptists.

Then the Calvinistic and Arminian factions of the Southern Baptists would split from one another and fight until one gained the upper hand.  I'm not real sure what would happen after that, but you can bet it wouldn't be pretty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I think they'd figure out in a hurry what the 1st Amendment was for, and why religon + government = really bad idea."</p>
<p>Yep.  I live in Texas.  I've sometimes tried to imagine what would happen here is the Christians had their unrestrained way with the government.  At first they'd all be giving each other high fives for their conquest.  Oh sure, atheists, Satanists, and Muslims would be in trouble from the get-go.  But who cares about them?  After a while Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses would start feeling the heat.  Mainline, "backslidden" denominations like the Methodists and Presbyterians would come next.  Before long the Seventh Day Adventists would be blacklisted, followed quickly by the United Pentecostals and the Church of Christ.  More "orthodox" Pentecostals like the Assemblies of God and Church of God would last longer, but would ultimately succumb before the awesome might of the Brobdingnagian Southern Baptists.</p>
<p>Then the Calvinistic and Arminian factions of the Southern Baptists would split from one another and fight until one gained the upper hand.  I'm not real sure what would happen after that, but you can bet it wouldn't be pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34203</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34203</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for saving me a lot of time.  I figured before I unloaded on this complete prick, I'd see who else was, and I see you've done it better than I could.  

Sometimes, I really wish we could do a Survivor-type show where we ship these annoyingly religious freaks off to a little island (okay, so we'd unfortunately need a large island) and see what happens when one group gains ascendency and starts persecuting the others.  I think they'd figure out in a hurry what the 1st Amendment was for, and why religon + government = really bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for saving me a lot of time.  I figured before I unloaded on this complete prick, I'd see who else was, and I see you've done it better than I could.  </p>
<p>Sometimes, I really wish we could do a Survivor-type show where we ship these annoyingly religious freaks off to a little island (okay, so we'd unfortunately need a large island) and see what happens when one group gains ascendency and starts persecuting the others.  I think they'd figure out in a hurry what the 1st Amendment was for, and why religon + government = really bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34202</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34202</guid>
		<description>I would love to see the Pledge read "one nation, under the Constitution. . ."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see the Pledge read "one nation, under the Constitution. . ."</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ridger</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34146</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ridger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/04/michael-medved-clueless-dominionist.html#comment-34146</guid>
		<description>Not to mention Jesus spent thirty years hanging out, eating, drinking, sleeping, chatting... if that's not "mingling" what is? He's &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; a god of the Bible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention Jesus spent thirty years hanging out, eating, drinking, sleeping, chatting... if that's not "mingling" what is? He's <i>not</i> a god of the Bible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
