< Previous: Sharing the Kook Mail Up: Site Index Next: Evolution and the Problem of Evil >
Daylight Atheism in the News

I just have to boast: I'm on TV!

Well, sort of, anyway. Daylight Atheism commenter RiddleOfSteel has brought to my attention this clip, in which Richard Dawkins is interviewed for the Canadian TV program The Agenda. As we all know by now, my essay "The New Ten Commandments" is quoted in Dr. Dawkins' book The God Delusion, and about halfway through the clip (at around 4:10), the interviewer reads one of my ten commandments verbatim.

That being said, I have to raise a substantial objection to the way my work is actually used. The interviewer's line of questioning for Dawkins is the standard, tired "why are you atheists so disrespectful of other people's faith" strategy. To my dismay, he quotes my third commandment - "Treat your fellow human beings, your fellow living things, and the world in general with love, honesty, faithfulness and respect" - and uses it to attack Dawkins in furtherance of this canard!

This is a serious misrepresentation of my views. I categorically did not mean by this that we should refrain from ever criticizing others or saying things that offend people's sensibilities. On the contrary, my ten commandments also include injunctions such as "Never seek to censor or cut yourself off from dissent; always respect the right of others to disagree with you", and especially, "Question everything".

In fact, in my third commandment, I define precisely what I mean by "respect":

"Respect" mandates treating others as inherently valuable, not using them as tools or means to an end that may be cast aside and discarded once they have made their contribution.

There is nothing in there about not criticizing other people's beliefs, nor should there be. In fact, I would argue that it shows more respect for others - respect for their intelligence and their ability for independent thought - to speak our minds freely to them and let them evaluate our arguments, rather than censor ourselves out of some spurious idea of politeness.

Richard Dawkins is dead-on when he states that religious beliefs have historically been surrounded by an abnormally and unjustifiably thick wall of respect. We atheists ought to make it our mission to demolish that wall: to raise people's consciousness and cause them to realize that religious beliefs, no less than any other category of beliefs, should be open to inquiry and criticism.

May 17, 2008, 11:31 pm • Posted in: The FoyerCommentOptions

Bookmark This:   Del.icio.us del.icio.us   Digg Digg   Reddit Reddit   StumbleUpon StumbleUpon  

13 Comments

I assume you've written in?

Not your first and I doubt your last "15 minutes of fame" Ebon.
I find actually that despite the admiration I have for Richard Dawkins in print (especially when he's on his home ground of genetics)he can come across as ineffectual in this type of interview. He was quick to disown your commandment (rather than give you credit)because of the use of the word "respect". He should , as did you, define the limits of that respect. His failure to do so diluted the point somewhat.

Oh, man! Can we still talk to you? If you don't want to associate with us anymore, I'll understand.

Seriously, cong-rats! It's renown well deserved.

Good for you! I can think of nobody more deserving of some attention. This is an excellent blog that should be read by everyone.

Congrats on being quoted on TV. Not so congrats on being misused. All in all, though, it's a nice piece of recognition.

It appears that people like me aren't the only ones being misconstued these days...

Spelling - "misconstrued"

Congratulations! You've been blurbed! It means you've arrived. (I've only been blurbed once, when an extremely mixed and mostly negative book review I wrote had one out- of- context positive sentence excerpted on the next edition of the book. It's very exciting.)

And yes. You're right. The idea that "respect" means "never expressing disagreement" is an absurd and harmful one. The distinction I try to draw is that I try to be critical of ideas and behaviors, not people. (I'm not always successful -- I have, on occasion, succumbed to the seductive allure of the snark -- but it's a useful distinction, and one that I strive for.)

If you rely on faith over reason, you forfeit some of my respect. I respect your right to think as you wish, but my respect for you as a sane, reasonable person diminishes. Respect for your rights is given. Respect for you is earned.

In the clip, the interviewer conflated respect for the rights of the deluded with respecting the deluded. It is comical to observe the believers of a mythology, the development of which can be clearly traced (The Origins of Christianity and the Bible/Benson), demanding respect for their delusion. Or not so comical when you contemplate that such mentality persists at top levels of Christian (Mr. President, tear down that wall) and Islam governments. Many thanks to the clear thinkers, Ebonmuse among them, making an effort to combat the superstitions that can destroy us.

There is nothing in there about not criticizing other people's beliefs, nor should there be. In fact, I would argue that it shows more respect for others - respect for their intelligence and their ability for independent thought

That's a very good point, and something that non-believers come up against quite regularly. In a sense it is insulting to play the sycophant with other people's beliefs.

Congrats, you deserve it. The nod on tv, not the misrepresentation.

Heh, you know you've hit the big time when you're quoted out of context. Perhaps next time they'll stuff your mouth full of words.

Good show.

Ditto on the congratulations, although I'm waiting for the day when you're the famous person, instead of just being mentioned offhand in some famous person's book or interview.

Leave a comment

This comment form is a trap for spambots. If you can see it, don't use it. Use the comment form below.

Please uncheck this box before submitting your comment

Do not uncheck this box

Please uncheck this box before submitting your comment

Do not uncheck this box

Please note: First-time commenters are subject to moderation.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comment preview:

Other options:

RECENT POSTS

MUST-READ POSTS (view all)

RECENT COMMENTS

SITE CATEGORIES (explanation)

ARCHIVES

BLOGROLL

PODCASTS

OTHER LINKS

THIS BLOG'S PARENT SITE

SEARCH THIS SITE

WHAT I'M READING

Doubt: A History by Jennifer Michael Hecht

past books >

The Humanist Symposium
The Out Campaign

RSS 2.0 FEED

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

WHY "DAYLIGHT ATHEISM"?

FEEDBACK

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Opera
Firefox
Net Atheists Top Sites Blog Top Sites

Powered by WordPress