<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Real Enemies of Free Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:09:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-69719</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-69719</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;I suspect the problem is largely that people are so used to whispering around religion that an everyday voice sounds like a shout.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
What a beautiful, eloquent way to put it. Lynet wins the thread for that comment. :)&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I agree, brilliantly put, Lynet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><blockquote>I suspect the problem is largely that people are so used to whispering around religion that an everyday voice sounds like a shout.</p></blockquote>
<p>What a beautiful, eloquent way to put it. Lynet wins the thread for that comment. :)</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree, brilliantly put, Lynet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebonmuse</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38654</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38654</guid>
		<description>You clearly didn&#039;t read the last three paragraphs of this post, Preston.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You clearly didn't read the last three paragraphs of this post, Preston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38653</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38653</guid>
		<description>I find this article highly ironic.  I hope you can see the ironic position you&#039;ve put yourselves in by deriding Goldstein for believing that atheists &quot;want to take over the world and outlaw religion.&quot;  What a silly and ridiculous notion!  It sounds like something right out of a conspiracy theory.  
Then, in the concluding paragraphs, it is very clearly stated that &quot;Their (Christians&#039;) goal is a world run by them and ruled according to their specific conception of God&#039;s will.&quot;  Nothing remotely ridiculous about that statement, no sir!  
I hope you can see how silly you&#039;ve made yourselves look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this article highly ironic.  I hope you can see the ironic position you've put yourselves in by deriding Goldstein for believing that atheists "want to take over the world and outlaw religion."  What a silly and ridiculous notion!  It sounds like something right out of a conspiracy theory.<br />
Then, in the concluding paragraphs, it is very clearly stated that "Their (Christians') goal is a world run by them and ruled according to their specific conception of God's will."  Nothing remotely ridiculous about that statement, no sir!<br />
I hope you can see how silly you've made yourselves look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bestonnet</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38646</link>
		<dc:creator>bestonnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 02:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38646</guid>
		<description>Leum:&lt;blockquote&gt;I believe the logic runs that since God created morality, morality is a Good Thing, so if nihilism denies God and morality it is a Bad Thing. Because, of course, good and bad are completely arbitrary designations with no meaning besides that which God gives them. This is, of course, completely different from when humans designate things good and bad, because that designation is entirely arbitrary and does not rest on God&#039;s will.

And if you understand that, congratulations, because I don&#039;t.&lt;/blockquote&gt;It&#039;s called moral relativism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leum:<br />
<blockquote>I believe the logic runs that since God created morality, morality is a Good Thing, so if nihilism denies God and morality it is a Bad Thing. Because, of course, good and bad are completely arbitrary designations with no meaning besides that which God gives them. This is, of course, completely different from when humans designate things good and bad, because that designation is entirely arbitrary and does not rest on God's will.</p>
<p>And if you understand that, congratulations, because I don't.</p></blockquote>
<p>It's called moral relativism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leum</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38635</link>
		<dc:creator>Leum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 03:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38635</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This may be a double post. I think my first attempt got auto-deleted for having too many links. Apologies if it was just in moderation.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;On point, here&#039;s a story about an Italian comedienne who faces five years in prison for lampooning the Pope. But watch out! Nasty atheists might hypothetically try to take away your free speech rights at some point in the future!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
But Ebon, don&#039;t you see. The above is an example of righteous judgment against evil God-hating blasphemers. Atheist censorship would be malicious persecution of good God-fearing worshipers! Intent matters far more than consequences. After all, if the Church makes some tiny little mistake (Galileo, Bruno, Joan of Arc), she can apologize or canonize the victim a few centuries later. Don&#039;t worry, God will know his own. On the other hand, the victims of atheist persecution might never receive a posthumous apology and atheists are notoriously unwilling to canonize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This may be a double post. I think my first attempt got auto-deleted for having too many links. Apologies if it was just in moderation.</i></p>
<blockquote cite=""><p>On point, here's a story about an Italian comedienne who faces five years in prison for lampooning the Pope. But watch out! Nasty atheists might hypothetically try to take away your free speech rights at some point in the future!</p></blockquote>
<p>But Ebon, don't you see. The above is an example of righteous judgment against evil God-hating blasphemers. Atheist censorship would be malicious persecution of good God-fearing worshipers! Intent matters far more than consequences. After all, if the Church makes some tiny little mistake (Galileo, Bruno, Joan of Arc), she can apologize or canonize the victim a few centuries later. Don't worry, God will know his own. On the other hand, the victims of atheist persecution might never receive a posthumous apology and atheists are notoriously unwilling to canonize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leum</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38634</link>
		<dc:creator>Leum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38634</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;My question is why people like Goldstein (and other folks - some of them on this site) consider this such a &quot;bad&quot; thing. Even if the accusation is true that atheism leads to Nihilism (which I think it does if some one follows it through to its logical conclusion, but I admit that can be debated) why is that so dreadful that people feel the need to avoid it at any cost?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I believe the logic runs that since God created morality, morality is a Good Thing, so if nihilism denies God and morality it is a Bad Thing. Because, of course, good and bad are completely arbitrary designations with no meaning besides that which God gives them. This is, of course, completely different from when humans designate things good and bad, because that designation is entirely arbitrary and does not rest on God&#039;s will.

And if you understand that, congratulations, because I don&#039;t.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;On point, here&#039;s a story about an Italian comedienne who faces five years in prison for lampooning the Pope. But watch out! Nasty atheists might hypothetically try to take away your free speech rights at some point in the future!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
But Ebon, don&#039;t you see? This is an example of righteous judgment against evil people. Atheist censorship would be malicious persecution against good people! It&#039;s not the action that matters, it&#039;s the intent. And if we happen to make &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tiny&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_of_Arc&quot; title=&quot;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mistake&lt;/a&gt; we can always apologize or canonize the victim a few centuries later. Don&#039;t worry, God will know his own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite=""><p>My question is why people like Goldstein (and other folks - some of them on this site) consider this such a "bad" thing. Even if the accusation is true that atheism leads to Nihilism (which I think it does if some one follows it through to its logical conclusion, but I admit that can be debated) why is that so dreadful that people feel the need to avoid it at any cost?</p></blockquote>
<p>I believe the logic runs that since God created morality, morality is a Good Thing, so if nihilism denies God and morality it is a Bad Thing. Because, of course, good and bad are completely arbitrary designations with no meaning besides that which God gives them. This is, of course, completely different from when humans designate things good and bad, because that designation is entirely arbitrary and does not rest on God's will.</p>
<p>And if you understand that, congratulations, because I don't.</p>
<blockquote cite=""><p>On point, here's a story about an Italian comedienne who faces five years in prison for lampooning the Pope. But watch out! Nasty atheists might hypothetically try to take away your free speech rights at some point in the future!</p></blockquote>
<p>But Ebon, don't you see? This is an example of righteous judgment against evil people. Atheist censorship would be malicious persecution against good people! It's not the action that matters, it's the intent. And if we happen to make <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giordano_Bruno" rel="nofollow">some</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei" title="" rel="nofollow">tiny</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_of_Arc" title="" rel="nofollow">mistake</a> we can always apologize or canonize the victim a few centuries later. Don't worry, God will know his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38631</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38631</guid>
		<description>Brad,

&quot;I think Christopher speaks mainly of moral nihilism. I&#039;m pretty sure he&#039;d agree everyone can create their own little islands of &quot;meaning.&quot; And I think xkcd has the more &quot;cheerful&quot; nihilism that dinosaur comics&#039; Utahraptor speaks of.&quot;

I am a &quot;moral&quot; Nihilist, but also an existential Nihilist - I hold that life has no intrinsic meaning or value, but like you said we can create meaning for ourselves.

My question is why people like Goldstein (and other folks - some of them on this site) consider this such a &quot;bad&quot; thing.  Even if the accusation is true that atheism leads to Nihilism (which I think it does if some one follows it through to its logical conclusion, but I admit that can be debated) why is that so dreadful that people feel the need to avoid it at any cost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad,</p>
<p>"I think Christopher speaks mainly of moral nihilism. I'm pretty sure he'd agree everyone can create their own little islands of "meaning." And I think xkcd has the more "cheerful" nihilism that dinosaur comics' Utahraptor speaks of."</p>
<p>I am a "moral" Nihilist, but also an existential Nihilist - I hold that life has no intrinsic meaning or value, but like you said we can create meaning for ourselves.</p>
<p>My question is why people like Goldstein (and other folks - some of them on this site) consider this such a "bad" thing.  Even if the accusation is true that atheism leads to Nihilism (which I think it does if some one follows it through to its logical conclusion, but I admit that can be debated) why is that so dreadful that people feel the need to avoid it at any cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebonmuse</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38630</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38630</guid>
		<description>On point, here&#039;s a story about &lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/09/thou_shalt_not_insult_the_pope.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an Italian comedienne who faces five years in prison for lampooning the Pope&lt;/a&gt;. But watch out! Nasty atheists might hypothetically try to take away your free speech rights at some point in the future!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On point, here's a story about <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/09/thou_shalt_not_insult_the_pope.php" rel="nofollow">an Italian comedienne who faces five years in prison for lampooning the Pope</a>. But watch out! Nasty atheists might hypothetically try to take away your free speech rights at some point in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crotch</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38621</link>
		<dc:creator>Crotch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38621</guid>
		<description>Just to be clear, Brad, the xkcd character you&#039;re referring to is called &quot;the existentialist&quot; on Wikipedia and elsewhere.

...

Conversation derailing contest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear, Brad, the xkcd character you're referring to is called "the existentialist" on Wikipedia and elsewhere.</p>
<p>...</p>
<p>Conversation derailing contest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modusoperandi</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38619</link>
		<dc:creator>Modusoperandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38619</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;should we conclude that the author is actually engaging in projection and accusing atheists of what he himself wants to do&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
Wups. Ignore my earlier comment. I should pay closer attention when I read. People tell me that I&#039;m unfocussed and easily distra-Hey! A shiny thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"should we conclude that the author is actually engaging in projection and accusing atheists of what he himself wants to do"</i><br />
Wups. Ignore my earlier comment. I should pay closer attention when I read. People tell me that I'm unfocussed and easily distra-Hey! A shiny thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modusoperandi</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38618</link>
		<dc:creator>Modusoperandi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38618</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;He tries to gloss over this point by calling such tyranny the &quot;logical outgrowth&quot; of our views&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
He&#039;s externalizing. It&#039;s what he&#039;d do if he could. This is why so many members of Christian Right shout &quot;No homo!&quot;, then get caught doing the gay mansex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"He tries to gloss over this point by calling such tyranny the "logical outgrowth" of our views"</i><br />
He's externalizing. It's what he'd do if he could. This is why so many members of Christian Right shout "No homo!", then get caught doing the gay mansex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/09/the-real-enemies-of-free-speech.html#comment-38614</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=828#comment-38614</guid>
		<description>I think Christopher speaks mainly of moral nihilism. I&#039;m pretty sure he&#039;d agree everyone can create their own little islands of &quot;meaning.&quot; And I think &lt;a href=&quot;http://xkcd.com/167/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;xkcd&lt;/a&gt; has the more &quot;cheerful&quot; nihilism that dinosaur comics&#039; Utahraptor speaks of.

(Yes, I revel in off-topicity.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Christopher speaks mainly of moral nihilism. I'm pretty sure he'd agree everyone can create their own little islands of "meaning." And I think <a href="http://xkcd.com/167/" rel="nofollow">xkcd</a> has the more "cheerful" nihilism that dinosaur comics' Utahraptor speaks of.</p>
<p>(Yes, I revel in off-topicity.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

