Comments on: To Bigotry No Sanction http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION. Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:09:52 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Thumpalumpacus http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-58577 Thumpalumpacus Thu, 05 Aug 2010 22:23:27 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-58577 Yep. I can only imagine the frustration that comes with being on the wrong side of history. Yep. I can only imagine the frustration that comes with being on the wrong side of history.

]]> By: Rollingforest http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-58576 Rollingforest Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:23:00 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-58576 Yeah, on the plus side, I don't think that any ruling would force other states to ban gay marriage. The worst they could do is allow states to ban it if they have the votes. This would slow down gay rights, but we will still eventually win as more tolerant youth get to voting age. Yeah, on the plus side, I don't think that any ruling would force other states to ban gay marriage. The worst they could do is allow states to ban it if they have the votes. This would slow down gay rights, but we will still eventually win as more tolerant youth get to voting age.

]]> By: Thumpalumpacus http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-58567 Thumpalumpacus Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:15:54 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-58567 The current USSC makeup is worrisome. But at worst, this may well be the gay-rights movement's <i>Dred Scott</i>. It seems to boil down to Kennedy and his views on the matter. (eta: a quick Wiki search gives some reason to hope that Kennedy may be a the swing vote to uphold this). The current USSC makeup is worrisome. But at worst, this may well be the gay-rights movement's Dred Scott.

It seems to boil down to Kennedy and his views on the matter. (eta: a quick Wiki search gives some reason to hope that Kennedy may be a the swing vote to uphold this).

]]> By: Rollingforest http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-58556 Rollingforest Thu, 05 Aug 2010 04:42:25 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-58556 Yeah, but the bigots are going to appeal. This could go to the Supreme Court and then who knows what will happen. Yeah, but the bigots are going to appeal. This could go to the Supreme Court and then who knows what will happen.

]]> By: Katie M http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-58540 Katie M Wed, 04 Aug 2010 21:06:38 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-58540 Prop 8 has just been ruled unconstitutional! Prop 8 has just been ruled unconstitutional!

]]> By: Brad http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-41409 Brad Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:00:30 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-41409 One possible answer is that the conservative sphere diffuses such scare-stories around and John got wind of it. (Perhaps that's presumptuous, though.) One possible answer is that the conservative sphere diffuses such scare-stories around and John got wind of it. (Perhaps that's presumptuous, though.)

]]> By: OMGF http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-41395 OMGF Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:11:18 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-41395 His good friend Ted Haggard told him? His good friend Ted Haggard told him?

]]> By: Alex Weaver http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-41394 Alex Weaver Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:00:11 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-41394 <blockquote>car is backed in, the guy is looking for oral, if the car is parked the other way, he is looking for anal. Nice place to bring your kids. And you want to make marriage OK among this group?</blockquote> Did "John" ever answer as to why he knows this?

car is backed in, the guy is looking for oral, if the car is parked the other way, he is looking for anal. Nice place to bring your kids. And you want to make marriage OK among this group?

Did "John" ever answer as to why he knows this?

]]> By: Brad http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-41375 Brad Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:24:20 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-41375 Ah - I wrote in blind haste. Forgive me, there are two "Johns" talking about homosexuality from a similar perspective, so that "D" didn't register with me. Okay, John D, I'm up for allowing an objective case against gay marriage. Ah - I wrote in blind haste.

Forgive me, there are two "Johns" talking about homosexuality from a similar perspective, so that "D" didn't register with me.

Okay, John D, I'm up for allowing an objective case against gay marriage.

]]> By: OMGF http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-41364 OMGF Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:32:23 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-41364 Brad, I don't think "John" ever asked us to consider him not to be a bigot. "John D" did, however. Brad,
I don't think "John" ever asked us to consider him not to be a bigot. "John D" did, however.

]]> By: bestonnet http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-41342 bestonnet Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:28:44 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-41342 That second last one really looks like an urban legend to me. That second last one really looks like an urban legend to me.

]]> By: Brad http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/11/to-bigotry-no-sanction.html#comment-41340 Brad Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:32:19 +0000 http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=880#comment-41340 John, I am willing to allow you aren't a bigot if you present good argument, but I think you have already shown a repulsion of homosexuality within your writings. Witness this all from a <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2008/10/yes-to-marriage-no-on-prop-8.html#comment-39643" rel="nofollow">single comment</a> of yours: <blockquote>homosexual lifestyle is abnormal by definition wrong in their genetic make-up the way some homo males talk allow them to officially marry and adopt kids - NO WAY!!!! disgusting to most straights images conjured-up in my mind are revolting car is backed in, the guy is looking for oral, if the car is parked the other way, he is looking for anal. Nice place to bring your kids. And you want to make marriage OK among this group? bestiality, another disgusting behaviour. Will we have bestiality pride marches someday?</blockquote> It was your plainly obvious attempt to make "this group" out to be foreign, disgusting, and revolting. So bring out those "reasonable and sound arguments." John,

I am willing to allow you aren't a bigot if you present good argument, but I think you have already shown a repulsion of homosexuality within your writings. Witness this all from a single comment of yours:

homosexual lifestyle is abnormal by definition

wrong in their genetic make-up

the way some homo males talk

allow them to officially marry and adopt kids - NO WAY!!!!

disgusting to most straights

images conjured-up in my mind are revolting

car is backed in, the guy is looking for oral, if the car is parked the other way, he is looking for anal. Nice place to bring your kids. And you want to make marriage OK among this group?

bestiality, another disgusting behaviour. Will we have bestiality pride marches someday?

It was your plainly obvious attempt to make "this group" out to be foreign, disgusting, and revolting. So bring out those "reasonable and sound arguments."

]]>