<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Liberty to Blaspheme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:09:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter N</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-56201</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-56201</guid>
		<description>Franklin,

Religious people constantly say because I am an atheist, I am morally depraved, that I commit heinous offenses against children for teaching them that religions are all outdated fairy tales, and I will suffer eternally in Hell.  Every day, from the pulpit, on TV, on billboards, at my front door.  I consider these remarks to be false and defamatory, and they offend me deeply.  So under your &quot;guidelines to free speech&quot; should these people be prohibited from making them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Franklin,</p>
<p>Religious people constantly say because I am an atheist, I am morally depraved, that I commit heinous offenses against children for teaching them that religions are all outdated fairy tales, and I will suffer eternally in Hell.  Every day, from the pulpit, on TV, on billboards, at my front door.  I consider these remarks to be false and defamatory, and they offend me deeply.  So under your "guidelines to free speech" should these people be prohibited from making them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thumpalumpacus</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-56199</link>
		<dc:creator>Thumpalumpacus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 15:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-56199</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The relationship of fundamentalists to their god is personal. To insult Allah or Mohhamed or Jesus is a sacrilege . God , to the religious is sacred. 

What would a muslim feel if you say that Allah is a killer and Muhhamed is a womanizer. Or what would a christian feel if you say Jesus was a zombie, a living dead.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Who cares?  In a free society, their recourse is to change the damned channel.  No one here has the right to not be offended.

&lt;blockquote&gt;What would you feel if somebody says your mother is a whore or god damn bitch.?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why does that matter at all?  This is merely a blatant appeal to emotion.  If the religious are &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; offended by sacrilege, good.  They can apparently use a little desensitization, and there&#039;s no time like now to start.

&lt;blockquote&gt;There must be guidelines to freedom of speech.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Gee, I wonder who you have in mind for writing those guidelines?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The relationship of fundamentalists to their god is personal. To insult Allah or Mohhamed or Jesus is a sacrilege . God , to the religious is sacred. </p>
<p>What would a muslim feel if you say that Allah is a killer and Muhhamed is a womanizer. Or what would a christian feel if you say Jesus was a zombie, a living dead.</p></blockquote>
<p>Who cares?  In a free society, their recourse is to change the damned channel.  No one here has the right to not be offended.</p>
<blockquote><p>What would you feel if somebody says your mother is a whore or god damn bitch.?</p></blockquote>
<p>Why does that matter at all?  This is merely a blatant appeal to emotion.  If the religious are <i>that</i> offended by sacrilege, good.  They can apparently use a little desensitization, and there's no time like now to start.</p>
<blockquote><p>There must be guidelines to freedom of speech.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gee, I wonder who you have in mind for writing those guidelines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: themann1086</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-56197</link>
		<dc:creator>themann1086</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-56197</guid>
		<description>Shorter franklin: Freedom of speech is great and all, but not when it&#039;s used to insult someone&#039;s feelings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorter franklin: Freedom of speech is great and all, but not when it's used to insult someone's feelings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Bowen</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-56196</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-56196</guid>
		<description>&quot;Your mother is whore&quot; may well be libelous. If it&#039;s not there&#039;s no legal redress so all one can do is feel offended. No-one has the right not to be offended.

Mohammed &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; a womaniser (and a pedophile). If someone wants to be offended by hearing that, fine! But there should be no legal protection from hearing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Your mother is whore" may well be libelous. If it's not there's no legal redress so all one can do is feel offended. No-one has the right not to be offended.</p>
<p>Mohammed <i>was</i> a womaniser (and a pedophile). If someone wants to be offended by hearing that, fine! But there should be no legal protection from hearing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-56195</link>
		<dc:creator>franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 08:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-56195</guid>
		<description>The relationship of fundamentalists to their god is personal. To insult Allah or Mohhamed or Jesus is a sacrilege . God , to the religious is sacred. 

What would a muslim feel if you say that Allah is a killer and Muhhamed is a womanizer. Or what would a christian feel if you say Jesus was a zombie, a living dead.

What would you feel if somebody says your mother is a whore or god damn bitch.?

There must be guidelines to freedom of speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relationship of fundamentalists to their god is personal. To insult Allah or Mohhamed or Jesus is a sacrilege . God , to the religious is sacred. </p>
<p>What would a muslim feel if you say that Allah is a killer and Muhhamed is a womanizer. Or what would a christian feel if you say Jesus was a zombie, a living dead.</p>
<p>What would you feel if somebody says your mother is a whore or god damn bitch.?</p>
<p>There must be guidelines to freedom of speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNRR</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-44474</link>
		<dc:creator>UNRR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-44474</guid>
		<description>This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 2/19/2009, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://unreligiousright.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Unreligious Right&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 2/19/2009, at <a href="http://unreligiousright.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">The Unreligious Right</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archimedez</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-44465</link>
		<dc:creator>Archimedez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-44465</guid>
		<description>My apologies; the above link didn&#039;t display properly. If you click on the red text that will take you to &lt;i&gt;The speech Geert Wilders would have given&lt;/i&gt; at the House of Lords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My apologies; the above link didn't display properly. If you click on the red text that will take you to <i>The speech Geert Wilders would have given</i> at the House of Lords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archimedez</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-44464</link>
		<dc:creator>Archimedez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-44464</guid>
		<description>Richie,

You can judge for yourself. Here is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1515&amp;Itemid=1&quot; title=&quot;The speech Geert Wilders would have given&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; at the House of Lords.

Kudos to Johann Hari and to the Indian newspaper, &lt;i&gt;The Statesman&lt;/i&gt;, for reprinting his essay.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richie,</p>
<p>You can judge for yourself. Here is <a href="http://www.geertwilders.nl/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1515&amp;Itemid=1" title="The speech Geert Wilders would have given" rel="nofollow"> at the House of Lords.</p>
<p>Kudos to Johann Hari and to the Indian newspaper, <i>The Statesman</i>, for reprinting his essay.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staceyjw</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-44462</link>
		<dc:creator>Staceyjw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-44462</guid>
		<description>How annoying, how predicable-

This type of thing makes me want to take tiny korans, use them for target practice (like that Marine last year), bronze them, and wear them as a charm or use it as a key chain. Maybe I&#039;ll make t-shirts with mohammad in a compromising position too.

Hey- a million dollar idea! Shocking enough to get press, which will guarantee success, AND a fatwah.  
What more could a woman want??? (I&#039;m going to do it- watch for the website.)

Is it deliberately offensive and provocative- YOU BET. Since it does NOT matter if you are deliberately or accidentally offensive, why bother holding back? This needs to be brought out, and slayed in the public, or this strangulation of freedom will continue to creep into our society.

SJW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How annoying, how predicable-</p>
<p>This type of thing makes me want to take tiny korans, use them for target practice (like that Marine last year), bronze them, and wear them as a charm or use it as a key chain. Maybe I'll make t-shirts with mohammad in a compromising position too.</p>
<p>Hey- a million dollar idea! Shocking enough to get press, which will guarantee success, AND a fatwah.<br />
What more could a woman want??? (I'm going to do it- watch for the website.)</p>
<p>Is it deliberately offensive and provocative- YOU BET. Since it does NOT matter if you are deliberately or accidentally offensive, why bother holding back? This needs to be brought out, and slayed in the public, or this strangulation of freedom will continue to creep into our society.</p>
<p>SJW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Speiser</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-44452</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Speiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-44452</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;You should try my girlfriends treatment for maintaining mental stability in today&#039;s world: only get your news from Jon Stewart and The Daily Show. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Throw in some Olbermann The Doberman for good measure...

&lt;blockquote&gt;She was doing great until we watched A. Pelosi&#039;s &quot;Right America&quot; last night.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ooooo, how was that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>You should try my girlfriends treatment for maintaining mental stability in today's world: only get your news from Jon Stewart and The Daily Show. </p></blockquote>
<p>Throw in some Olbermann The Doberman for good measure...</p>
<blockquote><p>She was doing great until we watched A. Pelosi's "Right America" last night.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ooooo, how was that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maynard</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-44448</link>
		<dc:creator>Maynard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-44448</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The recommended treatment is to expose the patient to six to eight weeks of nightly news reports.&lt;/i&gt;
You should try my girlfriends treatment for maintaining mental stability in today&#039;s world: only get your news from Jon Stewart and The Daily Show.  She was doing great until we watched A. Pelosi&#039;s &quot;Right America&quot; last night.

Why is it that the &lt;a href=&quot;//www.infowars.com/”&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Alex Joneses&lt;/a&gt; of the world start looking more sane as I get older?  He was the first person I ever heard rail against the dangers of the U.N.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The recommended treatment is to expose the patient to six to eight weeks of nightly news reports.</i><br />
You should try my girlfriends treatment for maintaining mental stability in today's world: only get your news from Jon Stewart and The Daily Show.  She was doing great until we watched A. Pelosi's "Right America" last night.</p>
<p>Why is it that the <a href="//www.infowars.com/”" rel="nofollow">Alex Joneses</a> of the world start looking more sane as I get older?  He was the first person I ever heard rail against the dangers of the U.N.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/the-liberty-to-blaspheme.html#comment-44425</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 01:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=957#comment-44425</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your suggestions, Ebonmuse.  I&#039;ve followed all three.  The UN&#039;s decision on this matter is most certainly a revolting development; I hope that our collective efforts bear fruit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your suggestions, Ebonmuse.  I've followed all three.  The UN's decision on this matter is most certainly a revolting development; I hope that our collective efforts bear fruit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

