Comments on: Rebutting The Case for a Creator

By: DSimon

DSimon — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:27:47 +0000

I look forward to reading your post--however may I point out--we ALL start off with and agenda, a bias. We ALL filter the evidence through our worldview and discover we are right!

Which of course is why no one ever changes their mind about anything. :-P

By: OMGF

OMGF — Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:22:31 +0000

OK, whatif, so what bias or agenda am I (or other atheists) using?

By: whatif

whatif — Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:58:13 +0000

I look forward to reading your post--however may I point out--we ALL start off with and agenda, a bias. We ALL filter the evidence through our worldview and discover we are right!

By: Modusoperandi

Modusoperandi — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:07:38 +0000

imissbubby "LoL. You're funny Modusoperandi." I am. I am, indeed. "Thanks..." Reading those books I linked (and the rest from here, if you've got the time) will be thanks enough.

By: OMGF

OMGF — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:16:32 +0000

It's pretty obvious that you don't know the difference between an empirically held view and a religious one. You can fight against the prevailing empirical reality of the universe, but it's a fool's errand. Evolution is backed by mountains of evidence, god OTOH, not so much.

By: imissbubby

imissbubby — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:59:19 +0000

Dear Chuck,
Stephen Meyer was also in the book.
He was a geophysist and has a PhD from Cambridge University.
Are you sure you read the right book?

By: imissbubby

imissbubby — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:53:30 +0000

Dear OM:

Richard Dawkins and his parents were Darwiniacs before he went to college or wrote any of his books.
Should we burn his stuff? lol

By: imissbubby

imissbubby — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 03:49:11 +0000

LoL. You're funny Modusoperandi.
Thanks...

By: Modusoperandi

Modusoperandi — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:16:29 +0000

OMFG: Do you know what Darwin got his phd in? As far as I know, nothing! He couldn't even hack it as a doctor! And his beard was as rough and unpleasant as he was! He wasn't even a scientist! He was a "naturalist", which I think involves being naked. There, Darwinism refuted. Refute my refution, I dare you! Take that, real world! Moo ha-ha! ... Imissbubby, Don't bother to thank me for slapping down OMFG and his Darwinism. I'm a giver. I'm generous like that. Humble, too. Also, what OMFG said. There are plenty of books on such things (start at Relics of Eden, Making of the Fittest and the always popular Your inner fish for evolution, Genesis: The Scientific Quest for Life's Origin for the big, open question of abiogenesis & Evolution: What the Fossils Say and Why It Matters, and work your way out from there). That way, at worst, you'll at least know what you're arguing against.

By: OMGF

OMGF — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:22:03 +0000

I suggest imissbubby that you pick up a science textbook. I also suggest that you find out some more about Wells, who is on record as denying evolution before his degree and only going to study it so that he can argue against it. Touting his PhD is rather absurd in that regard.

By: imissbubby

imissbubby — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:56:31 +0000

Dear Chuck,
Jonathan Wells, who was interviewed in the Case for a Creator, is a PhD in molecular and cell biology from Berkeley.

By: imissbubby

imissbubby — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:52:26 +0000

Great!
I'm looking forward to seeing the evidence on:
1.) Descent with modification.
2.) Abiogenesis.
3.) Fossils that have traits that make them look like the descendants of earlier ones.