<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Sense of Kinship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:09:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chas</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-53432</link>
		<dc:creator>chas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-53432</guid>
		<description>Interesting photo of a dragonfly. Here’s a 1971 Fleetwood Mac song I like 
entitled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITqvpZuq_kU&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dragonfly.&lt;/a&gt;

According to the youtube notes, the lyrics are based on a poem 
by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theglade.net/whdavies/a_poet%27s_calendar/august_15_to_31.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;W.H. Davies.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting photo of a dragonfly. Here’s a 1971 Fleetwood Mac song I like<br />
entitled <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITqvpZuq_kU" rel="nofollow">Dragonfly.</a></p>
<p>According to the youtube notes, the lyrics are based on a poem<br />
by <a href="http://www.theglade.net/whdavies/a_poet%27s_calendar/august_15_to_31.htm" rel="nofollow">W.H. Davies.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51961</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51961</guid>
		<description>Mike, that&#039;s an awesome idea!  We should totally start lobbying to get this taught in schools, and when it&#039;s revealed to be nothing but more religious bullshit, we should start imploring the courts to make schools &quot;teach the controversy.&quot;  And we&#039;ll steal all the Creatards &amp; IDiots from their own camps, lining them all up behind the Dumb Designer (who only guides, but does not directly interfere) with development, and then when religion is dead and gone, we do the Big Reveal!

The Dumb Designer = The Blind Watchmaker.  Turns out it was evolution, all along!  That rambunctious little scamp, &lt;i&gt;acting as if&lt;/i&gt; it had intelligence while utterly lacking it... wait, are we talking about blind watchmakers or design theorists now?  I forget...

&lt;b&gt;@ Entomologista:&lt;/b&gt;  Hoo boy, nature-rape.  Whenever people go on about the &quot;uniqueness&quot; of human evils, I just want to educate them &lt;i&gt;so much&lt;/i&gt; on how everything we do has been done before.  Well, except going to the Moon.  But still, it&#039;s starting to look like panspermia (and why not panovia?) may not actually be that unreasonable.  Single-celled organisms might be able to withstand, say, ejection into space from an impact, if the conditions are right.  The Universe being what it is (i.e. &quot;a &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; big place where rare things happen all the time&quot;), all we have to do is presumably go and actually find it.  And then not even space travel will be a homo sapiens original!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, that's an awesome idea!  We should totally start lobbying to get this taught in schools, and when it's revealed to be nothing but more religious bullshit, we should start imploring the courts to make schools "teach the controversy."  And we'll steal all the Creatards &amp; IDiots from their own camps, lining them all up behind the Dumb Designer (who only guides, but does not directly interfere) with development, and then when religion is dead and gone, we do the Big Reveal!</p>
<p>The Dumb Designer = The Blind Watchmaker.  Turns out it was evolution, all along!  That rambunctious little scamp, <i>acting as if</i> it had intelligence while utterly lacking it... wait, are we talking about blind watchmakers or design theorists now?  I forget...</p>
<p><b>@ Entomologista:</b>  Hoo boy, nature-rape.  Whenever people go on about the "uniqueness" of human evils, I just want to educate them <i>so much</i> on how everything we do has been done before.  Well, except going to the Moon.  But still, it's starting to look like panspermia (and why not panovia?) may not actually be that unreasonable.  Single-celled organisms might be able to withstand, say, ejection into space from an impact, if the conditions are right.  The Universe being what it is (i.e. "a <i>really</i> big place where rare things happen all the time"), all we have to do is presumably go and actually find it.  And then not even space travel will be a homo sapiens original!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entomologista</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51957</link>
		<dc:creator>Entomologista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51957</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great picture. Dragonflies are aerial hunters, which is why they need big eyes. Males actually have a territory they defend from rivals. There is an amazing amount of behavior exhibited by insects, considering how tiny their brains are. 

And yes, their mating is weird. And violent. The male grabs the female by the head, often puncturing her exoskeleton. In some damselflies the male holds the female under water until she&#039;s forced to release the eggs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's a great picture. Dragonflies are aerial hunters, which is why they need big eyes. Males actually have a territory they defend from rivals. There is an amazing amount of behavior exhibited by insects, considering how tiny their brains are. </p>
<p>And yes, their mating is weird. And violent. The male grabs the female by the head, often puncturing her exoskeleton. In some damselflies the male holds the female under water until she's forced to release the eggs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Archimedez</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51955</link>
		<dc:creator>Archimedez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51955</guid>
		<description>Generally related to the theme of Ebon&#039;s post, some of you may be interested in the CBC documentary about Darwin, which is a multi-part series.
http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/natureofthings/2009/darwin/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally related to the theme of Ebon's post, some of you may be interested in the CBC documentary about Darwin, which is a multi-part series.<br />
<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/natureofthings/2009/darwin/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/natureofthings/2009/darwin/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeK</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51948</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51948</guid>
		<description>Looking at the photo, nature, the human race, etc., has tempted me to reconsider Intelligent Design. What if the Designer wasn&#039;t that swift? Maybe dull-normal at best like most ID&#039;ers. Even stupid! Or with a twisted sense of humor -- Monty Pythoesque maybe. Certainly a Brit sense of humor. Or our Universe was designed by a committee or a celestial congress, sorta like the tax codes. That&#039;d explain a lot.

Dumb Design. DD.

Sorta off topic, just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the photo, nature, the human race, etc., has tempted me to reconsider Intelligent Design. What if the Designer wasn't that swift? Maybe dull-normal at best like most ID'ers. Even stupid! Or with a twisted sense of humor -- Monty Pythoesque maybe. Certainly a Brit sense of humor. Or our Universe was designed by a committee or a celestial congress, sorta like the tax codes. That'd explain a lot.</p>
<p>Dumb Design. DD.</p>
<p>Sorta off topic, just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MissCherryPi</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51932</link>
		<dc:creator>MissCherryPi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51932</guid>
		<description>So the first single celled organism was at Happy Isles Trail-head in Yosemite? Good to know. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the first single celled organism was at Happy Isles Trail-head in Yosemite? Good to know. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ebonmuse</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51931</link>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51931</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I didn&#039;t realize I was bracing myself for a statement that took for granted that &quot;humans are the pinnacle of evolution!&quot; until I felt the relief wash over me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would deserve a verbal flogging if I made a mistake like that, AnonaMiss. :)

&lt;blockquote&gt;I think there is more to the story of this dragonfly...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sorry to disappoint you, Mike, but &lt;i&gt;longipennis&lt;/i&gt; is Latin for &quot;long wings&quot;. If your tastes run to dragonfly porn, however, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earthlife.net/insects/odonata.html#4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; are some prurient details. (No nymphs or larvae are allowed to click on that link, thanks.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I didn't realize I was bracing myself for a statement that took for granted that "humans are the pinnacle of evolution!" until I felt the relief wash over me.</p></blockquote>
<p>I would deserve a verbal flogging if I made a mistake like that, AnonaMiss. :)</p>
<blockquote><p>I think there is more to the story of this dragonfly...</p></blockquote>
<p>Sorry to disappoint you, Mike, but <i>longipennis</i> is Latin for "long wings". If your tastes run to dragonfly porn, however, <a href="http://www.earthlife.net/insects/odonata.html#4" rel="nofollow">here</a> are some prurient details. (No nymphs or larvae are allowed to click on that link, thanks.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nioclás</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51930</link>
		<dc:creator>Nioclás</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51930</guid>
		<description>@mike:

The &quot;pennis&quot; in &quot;longipennis&quot; probably means &quot;leaf&quot; (and by meaning extension, &quot;wing&quot;), so &quot;longipennis&quot; probably means &quot;long-wings&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike:</p>
<p>The "pennis" in "longipennis" probably means "leaf" (and by meaning extension, "wing"), so "longipennis" probably means "long-wings".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caiphen</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51928</link>
		<dc:creator>Caiphen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51928</guid>
		<description>To think, I thought I was great in my early 20&#039;s when I learnt to programme a Programmable Logic Controller when I did Elec Engineering. I sit back and laugh at myself now.

It&#039;s a damn shame that life is so short!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To think, I thought I was great in my early 20's when I learnt to programme a Programmable Logic Controller when I did Elec Engineering. I sit back and laugh at myself now.</p>
<p>It's a damn shame that life is so short!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51927</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51927</guid>
		<description>I &lt;i&gt;love&lt;/i&gt; close-up photos of insects.  I spent about a year of my childhood trapping, poisoning, and collecting elephant stag beetles, giant horseflies, praying mantises, spiders, various bees and moths and butterflies, and stuffing them into tiny little boxes with miniature magnifying glasses on top.  I never felt kinship until I learned about evolution (which I didn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; learn about until after I graduated high school... stupid American educational stystem...), but I was always fascinated by these &quot;tiny monsters.&quot;

Great stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <i>love</i> close-up photos of insects.  I spent about a year of my childhood trapping, poisoning, and collecting elephant stag beetles, giant horseflies, praying mantises, spiders, various bees and moths and butterflies, and stuffing them into tiny little boxes with miniature magnifying glasses on top.  I never felt kinship until I learned about evolution (which I didn't <i>really</i> learn about until after I graduated high school... stupid American educational stystem...), but I was always fascinated by these "tiny monsters."</p>
<p>Great stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51922</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51922</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I don&#039;t usually like close-up photos of insects - they have an eerie, alien feel that I find disturbing. (I admit it, I&#039;m a mammal chauvinist.) But this one is one of the rare exceptions. Looking at it again, it&#039;s hard for me not to feel admiration for this sleek, graceful creature.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe it&#039;s just me, but it helps that you can&#039;t see its mouthparts. O.o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I don't usually like close-up photos of insects - they have an eerie, alien feel that I find disturbing. (I admit it, I'm a mammal chauvinist.) But this one is one of the rare exceptions. Looking at it again, it's hard for me not to feel admiration for this sleek, graceful creature.</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe it's just me, but it helps that you can't see its mouthparts. O.o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: konrad_arflane</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/a-sense-of-kinship.html#comment-51921</link>
		<dc:creator>konrad_arflane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1197#comment-51921</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Longipennis? I think there is more to the story of this dragonfly...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

IIRC, dragonfly reproduction is profoundly weird. Not quite in that sense, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Longipennis? I think there is more to the story of this dragonfly...</p></blockquote>
<p>IIRC, dragonfly reproduction is profoundly weird. Not quite in that sense, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

