<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: The Quantum Mechanic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:09:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kennypo65</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-58633</link>
		<dc:creator>Kennypo65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 01:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-58633</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait to read this book. I hope it&#039;s as good as you say it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can't wait to read this book. I hope it's as good as you say it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie M</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54991</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54991</guid>
		<description>FINALLY found time to finish reading the draft on the website-this is wonderful, D!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FINALLY found time to finish reading the draft on the website-this is wonderful, D!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Wilder</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54985</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Wilder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54985</guid>
		<description>Let me just second Adam&#039;s glowing review. I read the book (in fact I could hardly put it down!) and I think it was excellently written. The only bad thing I can say about it is actually a compliment - I want MOAR! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me just second Adam's glowing review. I read the book (in fact I could hardly put it down!) and I think it was excellently written. The only bad thing I can say about it is actually a compliment - I want MOAR! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54839</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54839</guid>
		<description>The book arrived yesterday and I just pulled it out of the mailbox this morning.  I even ignored the Olympic Games to finish it.  D, nicely done.

We all play games, and TQM&#039;s Civilization Game is the best we are going to get. After all, its nothing but the play of energy across space and time.  Or, as was put in the book, its nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book arrived yesterday and I just pulled it out of the mailbox this morning.  I even ignored the Olympic Games to finish it.  D, nicely done.</p>
<p>We all play games, and TQM's Civilization Game is the best we are going to get. After all, its nothing but the play of energy across space and time.  Or, as was put in the book, its nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pradeep</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54617</link>
		<dc:creator>pradeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54617</guid>
		<description>While I recommend buying the book to help a fellow blogger out, you can read a first draft of the book at D&#039;s site itself:

http://she-who-chatters.blogspot.com/2009/11/quantum-mechanic-prologue.html

I am on Chapter 10 and will probably finish reading it online before purchasing a hard copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I recommend buying the book to help a fellow blogger out, you can read a first draft of the book at D's site itself:</p>
<p><a href="http://she-who-chatters.blogspot.com/2009/11/quantum-mechanic-prologue.html" rel="nofollow">http://she-who-chatters.blogspot.com/2009/11/quantum-mechanic-prologue.html</a></p>
<p>I am on Chapter 10 and will probably finish reading it online before purchasing a hard copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54600</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 04:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54600</guid>
		<description>Hey, that&#039;s some really cool stuff, Snoof!  Thanks for sharing!  From what I&#039;ve read so far, what it lacks in technobabble and philosophy, it more than makes up for with psychology and sexy.  Like, it&#039;s stuff &lt;i&gt;I want to do&lt;/i&gt;, not stuff I think &lt;i&gt;God ought to do&lt;/i&gt;.  But I did a bunch of pretty egregious author insertion in &lt;a href=&quot;http://she-who-chatters.blogspot.com/2009/01/rendezvous-prologue.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my previous NaNoWriMo effort&lt;/a&gt;, and it got a little Mary Sue, so I tried balancing everything positive with something awful, but it just turned into a mess.  So I guess what I&#039;m saying is that &lt;i&gt;TQM&lt;/i&gt; very nearly turned out &lt;i&gt;even more&lt;/i&gt; like &lt;i&gt;La Muse&lt;/i&gt;!  :)

Anyway, I&#039;m gonna be up &lt;i&gt;all night&lt;/i&gt; reading this, thanks for sharing!  (Favorite line so far:  &quot;We play long games.  This is mine.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that's some really cool stuff, Snoof!  Thanks for sharing!  From what I've read so far, what it lacks in technobabble and philosophy, it more than makes up for with psychology and sexy.  Like, it's stuff <i>I want to do</i>, not stuff I think <i>God ought to do</i>.  But I did a bunch of pretty egregious author insertion in <a href="http://she-who-chatters.blogspot.com/2009/01/rendezvous-prologue.html" rel="nofollow">my previous NaNoWriMo effort</a>, and it got a little Mary Sue, so I tried balancing everything positive with something awful, but it just turned into a mess.  So I guess what I'm saying is that <i>TQM</i> very nearly turned out <i>even more</i> like <i>La Muse</i>!  :)</p>
<p>Anyway, I'm gonna be up <i>all night</i> reading this, thanks for sharing!  (Favorite line so far:  "We play long games.  This is mine.")</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snoof</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54596</link>
		<dc:creator>Snoof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54596</guid>
		<description>I just read the version which appears on D&#039;s blog, and I just realised - I&#039;ve read something very similar before, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bigheadpress.com/lamuse&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;

Not that I&#039;m complaining - it&#039;s interesting to see how different people have different takes on the same basic story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read the version which appears on D's blog, and I just realised - I've read something very similar before, <a href="http://www.bigheadpress.com/lamuse" rel="nofollow">here.</a></p>
<p>Not that I'm complaining - it's interesting to see how different people have different takes on the same basic story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jormungund</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54594</link>
		<dc:creator>Jormungund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54594</guid>
		<description>Nathaniel,
If we had a deity personally working to ensure our species continuation and spread throughout the universe, then I would assume that we wouldn&#039;t be burning oil anymore. Couldn&#039;t he just make electrons flow through wires for us or make turbines that are always spinning for us to harness the power of? When it comes to resources, such a being could break the concept of economic scarcity as we know it.
That, and a being such as this could probably stop us from messing with other countries if it wanted to.
I haven&#039;t read the book, but off the top of my head this seems to make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathaniel,<br />
If we had a deity personally working to ensure our species continuation and spread throughout the universe, then I would assume that we wouldn't be burning oil anymore. Couldn't he just make electrons flow through wires for us or make turbines that are always spinning for us to harness the power of? When it comes to resources, such a being could break the concept of economic scarcity as we know it.<br />
That, and a being such as this could probably stop us from messing with other countries if it wanted to.<br />
I haven't read the book, but off the top of my head this seems to make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mimema</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54593</link>
		<dc:creator>Mimema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54593</guid>
		<description>Hah, I was just about to clarify for D that she&#039;s a hard determinist and that &quot;free will&quot; was likely being used in the compatibilist sense, but I see D has already done that. So I&#039;ll just echo the sentiments -- &#039;s a good book, and a quick read. D&#039;s labored hard over every aspect of her baby, and I, too, found it a pleasurable read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, I was just about to clarify for D that she's a hard determinist and that "free will" was likely being used in the compatibilist sense, but I see D has already done that. So I'll just echo the sentiments -- 's a good book, and a quick read. D's labored hard over every aspect of her baby, and I, too, found it a pleasurable read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54592</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54592</guid>
		<description>Funny you should mention that, Nathaniel - I actually address your first point at length in a paperback-only chapter (Chapter 4 - Small Victories), and the victim is named &quot;Nate,&quot; as chance would have it.  As for your second point, it&#039;s more or less covered in the spoiler-tagged section above.  I hope you enjoy reading it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should mention that, Nathaniel - I actually address your first point at length in a paperback-only chapter (Chapter 4 - Small Victories), and the victim is named "Nate," as chance would have it.  As for your second point, it's more or less covered in the spoiler-tagged section above.  I hope you enjoy reading it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathaniel</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54591</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54591</guid>
		<description>Sounds interesting. I&#039;ll definitely check it out.

What occurs to me though is that while it would be relatively easy to prevent harm of somebody trying to punch another person, what about preventing emotional abuse through constant cruel and cutting words? Not all abusive spouses control with their fists? Another sort of harm is having an oil come into a country with limited government, give money to the right people and then exploiting an oil reserve, even at befouls the environment and starts harming the health of local people. Would Douglas prevent the oil company from landing in the first place? Would he reverse the environmental damage?

Definitely will check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds interesting. I'll definitely check it out.</p>
<p>What occurs to me though is that while it would be relatively easy to prevent harm of somebody trying to punch another person, what about preventing emotional abuse through constant cruel and cutting words? Not all abusive spouses control with their fists? Another sort of harm is having an oil come into a country with limited government, give money to the right people and then exploiting an oil reserve, even at befouls the environment and starts harming the health of local people. Would Douglas prevent the oil company from landing in the first place? Would he reverse the environmental damage?</p>
<p>Definitely will check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/02/the-quantum-mechanic.html#comment-54590</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1539#comment-54590</guid>
		<description>Hi, everybody!  I thought I should answer a couple questions and clarify a couple things, so here goes:

&lt;b&gt;@ Jim Baerg (#3):&lt;/b&gt;  OK, so it wasn&#039;t a question, but thanks for recommending &lt;i&gt;The Salvation War&lt;/i&gt;!  Interestingly enough, checking out the page for it on TVtropes took me on a wiki walk that ended up at &lt;a href=&quot;http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WikiWalk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the entry on &quot;wiki walk&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  some six hours later (I&#039;d never heard the term before).

&lt;b&gt;@ Reginald Selkirk (#5), Jormungund (#7), &amp; Zietlos (#10):&lt;/b&gt;  You have to remember here that Ebonmuse is a compatibilist, and he thinks that man is free as an undammed river is free (whereas I, a determinist, think that an undammed river simply is not free).

&lt;b&gt;SPOILER ALERT!&lt;/b&gt; At any rate, what this means (as I explain briefly at the start of &lt;a href=&quot;http://she-who-chatters.blogspot.com/2009/11/quantum-mechanic-chapter-six.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chapter 6 [online]&lt;/a&gt;/Chapter 7 [paperback]) is that the Quantum Mechanic simply &quot;gets in the way&quot; of any harm that would befall a person.  You can still go through whatever motions you like, but the God/King/Hero simply sees to it that no harm comes of it, The End.  &lt;b&gt;END SPOILERS.&lt;/b&gt;

Steve Bowen explains the philosophical aspect of it rather handily as applies to the bullshit answers handed out by theodicies galore, but the point is that the Quantum Mechanic wants humanity to go about its business; he simply sees to it that nobody gets hurt in the process.

&lt;b&gt;@ Lenoxus (#6):&lt;/b&gt;  Oh, there&#039;s conflict and corruption.  I think you&#039;ll like where it goes, you&#039;ve got it partly right and partly wrong.  If you do read it, then I &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; hope you like it!  (Not just &#039;cuz I wrote it, but because I think it would defy your expectations in interesting ways, and satisfy them in other interesting ways.)

At any rate, some of these comments are already giving me fuel for another book, something from the opposite angle and with a psychological bent rather than a philosophical one.  Although maybe such a thing would be a bit too weird, I dunno...  But thanks to everyone who gave me a suggestion or encouragement during November, and double-thanks to everyone who&#039;s bought a copy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, everybody!  I thought I should answer a couple questions and clarify a couple things, so here goes:</p>
<p><b>@ Jim Baerg (#3):</b>  OK, so it wasn't a question, but thanks for recommending <i>The Salvation War</i>!  Interestingly enough, checking out the page for it on TVtropes took me on a wiki walk that ended up at <a href="http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WikiWalk" rel="nofollow">the entry on "wiki walk"</a>  some six hours later (I'd never heard the term before).</p>
<p><b>@ Reginald Selkirk (#5), Jormungund (#7), &amp; Zietlos (#10):</b>  You have to remember here that Ebonmuse is a compatibilist, and he thinks that man is free as an undammed river is free (whereas I, a determinist, think that an undammed river simply is not free).</p>
<p><b>SPOILER ALERT!</b> At any rate, what this means (as I explain briefly at the start of <a href="http://she-who-chatters.blogspot.com/2009/11/quantum-mechanic-chapter-six.html" rel="nofollow">Chapter 6 [online]</a>/Chapter 7 [paperback]) is that the Quantum Mechanic simply "gets in the way" of any harm that would befall a person.  You can still go through whatever motions you like, but the God/King/Hero simply sees to it that no harm comes of it, The End.  <b>END SPOILERS.</b></p>
<p>Steve Bowen explains the philosophical aspect of it rather handily as applies to the bullshit answers handed out by theodicies galore, but the point is that the Quantum Mechanic wants humanity to go about its business; he simply sees to it that nobody gets hurt in the process.</p>
<p><b>@ Lenoxus (#6):</b>  Oh, there's conflict and corruption.  I think you'll like where it goes, you've got it partly right and partly wrong.  If you do read it, then I <i>really</i> hope you like it!  (Not just 'cuz I wrote it, but because I think it would defy your expectations in interesting ways, and satisfy them in other interesting ways.)</p>
<p>At any rate, some of these comments are already giving me fuel for another book, something from the opposite angle and with a psychological bent rather than a philosophical one.  Although maybe such a thing would be a bit too weird, I dunno...  But thanks to everyone who gave me a suggestion or encouragement during November, and double-thanks to everyone who's bought a copy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

