<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Case for a Creator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:09:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reading a Christian Apologetics Book After Becoming an Atheist &#124; Friendly Atheist</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-68991</link>
		<dc:creator>Reading a Christian Apologetics Book After Becoming an Atheist &#124; Friendly Atheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-68991</guid>
		<description>[...] and let her know if she missed anything important!Just FYI, Adam Lee at Daylight Atheism wrote a thorough chapter-by-chapter rebuttal to one of Strobel&#8217;s other books, The Case for a Creator. And atheist Jeffery J. Lowder wrote [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and let her know if she missed anything important!Just FYI, Adam Lee at Daylight Atheism wrote a thorough chapter-by-chapter rebuttal to one of Strobel&#8217;s other books, The Case for a Creator. And atheist Jeffery J. Lowder wrote [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defending Dawkins &#171; Friendly Humanist</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-61570</link>
		<dc:creator>Defending Dawkins &#171; Friendly Humanist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-61570</guid>
		<description>[...] On the other side of the issue, I have read creationist apologists like Lee Strobel and John Blanchard argue for an evolution-denying ideology. They consistently fail to accurately represent the case for evolution, and then inexpertly demolish the straw men they have invented. (I&#8217;ve discussed Blanchard&#8217;s attempt here. Strobel is being taken apart in exquisite detail by Ebonmuse here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the other side of the issue, I have read creationist apologists like Lee Strobel and John Blanchard argue for an evolution-denying ideology. They consistently fail to accurately represent the case for evolution, and then inexpertly demolish the straw men they have invented. (I&#8217;ve discussed Blanchard&#8217;s attempt here. Strobel is being taken apart in exquisite detail by Ebonmuse here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; The Language of God: In the Beginning&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60463</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; The Language of God: In the Beginning&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60463</guid>
		<description>[...] Collins is a smart guy, right? Now, every occasion is greeted by horrible apologetics; they gave me &quot;The Case for a Creator&quot; for my birthday. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Collins is a smart guy, right? Now, every occasion is greeted by horrible apologetics; they gave me &quot;The Case for a Creator&quot; for my birthday. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; Introducing a New Guest Author</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60456</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; Introducing a New Guest Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60456</guid>
		<description>[...] month, I concluded my post series of chapter-by-chapter responses to Lee Strobel&#039;s The Case for a Creator. I&#039;m happy with the way this project turned out, and I&#039;d been wanting to do it again, but I wasn&#039;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month, I concluded my post series of chapter-by-chapter responses to Lee Strobel&#39;s The Case for a Creator. I&#39;m happy with the way this project turned out, and I&#39;d been wanting to do it again, but I wasn&#39;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Redefining Science</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60454</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Redefining Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60454</guid>
		<description>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Spiritual Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60451</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Spiritual Wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60451</guid>
		<description>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: TV Sets and Tennis Shoes</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60448</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: TV Sets and Tennis Shoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60448</guid>
		<description>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Science by Armchair</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60446</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Science by Armchair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60446</guid>
		<description>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Why We Lost the Vietnam War</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60444</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Why We Lost the Vietnam War</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60444</guid>
		<description>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Belief and Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60441</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Belief and Decision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60441</guid>
		<description>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Soup&#8217;s On!</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60433</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Soup&#8217;s On!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60433</guid>
		<description>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Information Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/series/the-case-for-a-creator#comment-60431</link>
		<dc:creator>Daylight Atheism &#62; The Case for a Creator: Information Wars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?page_id=998#comment-60431</guid>
		<description>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rebutting The Case for a Creator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

