<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daylight Atheism &#187; Anthropics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/tag/anthropics/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Case for a Creator: Galileo the Troublemaker</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/cfac-galileo-the-troublemaker.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/cfac-galileo-the-troublemaker.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Catholicism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Case for a Creator, Chapter 7
To start off his interview, Lee Strobel asks Gonzalez and Richards about humankind's great demotion: the medieval religious belief that we were at "the center of the universe, sort of the throne of the cosmos, the most important place that everything revolved around" [p.160] and the overturning of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Case for a Creator</i>, Chapter 7</p>
<p>To start off his interview, Lee Strobel asks Gonzalez and Richards about humankind's great demotion: the medieval religious belief that we were at "the center of the universe, sort of the throne of the cosmos, the most important place that everything revolved around" [p.160] and the overturning of this belief by science, which proved that we are not at the center of the universe either physically or metaphysically. Richards claims, however, "that this ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/cfac-galileo-the-troublemaker.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/cfac-galileo-the-troublemaker.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case for a Creator: All the Starry Heavens</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/cfac-all-the-starry-heavens.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/cfac-all-the-starry-heavens.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Case for a Creator, Chapter 7
Chapter 7 of Case is about the argument from planetary fine-tuning. This time, Strobel has two interviewees: Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay Wesley Richards, both affiliated with the Discovery Institute. Since we're keeping count of scientific "authorities", which is whom Strobel claims to be interviewing, let me point out for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Case for a Creator</i>, Chapter 7</p>
<p>Chapter 7 of <i>Case</i> is about the argument from planetary fine-tuning. This time, Strobel has two interviewees: Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay Wesley Richards, both affiliated with the Discovery Institute. Since we're keeping count of scientific "authorities", which is whom Strobel claims to be interviewing, let me point out for the record that Gonzalez has a legitimate Ph.D in astronomy from the University of Washington. Richards, meanwhile, is ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/cfac-all-the-starry-heavens.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/11/cfac-all-the-starry-heavens.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Answering Lee Strobel&#039;s Questions for Atheists</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/answering-lee-strobel.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/answering-lee-strobel.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics and Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gods of the Gaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historicity of Jesus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friendly Atheist has posted the third part of a dialogue with Christian apologist Lee Strobel. In it, Strobel poses questions that he thinks would be the most effective at planting seeds of faith in an atheist's mind. In this post, I'll answer those questions. I've written on some of these issues at greater length in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2009/01/29/lee-strobel-answers-your-questions-part-3/">Friendly Atheist</a> has posted the third part of a dialogue with Christian apologist Lee Strobel. In it, Strobel poses questions that he thinks would be the most effective at planting seeds of faith in an atheist's mind. In this post, I'll answer those questions. I've written on some of these issues at greater length in the past, and I'll also provide links to those essays where ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/answering-lee-strobel.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/02/answering-lee-strobel.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Putting Humanity on a Pedestal</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/putting-humanity-on-a-pedestal.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/putting-humanity-on-a-pedestal.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/putting-humanity-on-a-pedestal.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The history of the human species is, as Carl Sagan put it, a series of great demotions. Prior to the scientific age, humanity believed that we were the crowning glory of creation, and that all the universe existed merely to pay tribute to us. But the advances in understanding brought about by the dawning of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The history of the human species is, as Carl Sagan put it, a series of great demotions. Prior to the scientific age, humanity believed that we were the crowning glory of creation, and that all the universe existed merely to pay tribute to us. But the advances in understanding brought about by the dawning of the Age of Reason steadily undermined this belief, and though the partisans of superstition fought viciously against every new piece of knowledge, they have been steadily losing ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/putting-humanity-on-a-pedestal.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/07/putting-humanity-on-a-pedestal.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

