<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daylight Atheism &#187; Cosmology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/tag/cosmology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Weekly Link Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/08/weekly-link-roundup-17.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/08/weekly-link-roundup-17.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 05:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Foyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miracles & Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Catholicism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=4234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The storm may rage and the winds may howl, but I'm still here! (So far.) Here's a couple of interesting stories I didn't have time to write more about this week:
&#8226; Following Rick Perry's urgent prayers for rain in his drought-stricken state, Tropical Storm Don formed in the Gulf, headed toward Texas, and then dissipated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The storm may rage and the winds may howl, but I'm still here! (So far.) Here's a couple of interesting stories I didn't have time to write more about this week:</p>
<p>&bull; Following <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/08/rick-perrys-prayer-follies.html">Rick Perry's urgent prayers for rain</a> in his drought-stricken state, <a href="http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/gesNews/tropical_storm_don_drop_bucket">Tropical Storm Don formed in the Gulf, headed toward Texas, and then dissipated ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/08/weekly-link-roundup-17.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/08/weekly-link-roundup-17.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Link Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/08/weekly-link-roundup-16.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/08/weekly-link-roundup-16.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Foyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death and Dying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics and Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sects and Cults]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=4152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some scattered thoughts to contemplate on a Saturday morning:
&#8226; Earlier this year, my post on urban agriculture drew some spirited disagreement. Now there's a study from Ohio State University which concludes that Cleveland could supply all its own produce, poultry and honey if the many vacant lots in the shrinking, ... [visit site to read [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some scattered thoughts to contemplate on a Saturday morning:</p>
<p>&bull; Earlier this year, my post on <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/04/a-humanist-easter-homily.html">urban agriculture</a> drew some spirited disagreement. Now there's a study from Ohio State University which concludes that <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/08/growing-self-sufficient-cities/">Cleveland could supply all its own produce, poultry and honey</a> if the many vacant lots in the shrinking, ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/08/weekly-link-roundup-16.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/08/weekly-link-roundup-16.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>200,000 Earths</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/07/200-000-earths.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/07/200-000-earths.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=4001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Think we're all ready to talk about something else for a while? &#8212;Ebonmuse]
In May 1987, astronomers witnessed a once-in-a-lifetime event: a supernova, the explosive death of a supergiant star, in the Large Magellanic Cloud approximately 170,000 light-years from Earth. SN 1987A, as it was named, was the first supernova to be studied using the instruments [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<i>Think we're all ready to talk about something else for a while? &mdash;Ebonmuse</i>]</p>
<p>In May 1987, astronomers witnessed a once-in-a-lifetime event: a supernova, the explosive death of a supergiant star, in the Large Magellanic Cloud approximately 170,000 light-years from Earth. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SN_1987A">SN 1987A</a>, as it was named, was the first supernova to be studied using the instruments of modern astronomy (although not the first supernova witnessed by ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/07/200-000-earths.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/07/200-000-earths.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Am An Atom of Atheism</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/i-am-an-atom-of-atheism.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/i-am-an-atom-of-atheism.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 21:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Foyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blog Ungodly News has created a whimsical periodic table of atheism, and I was surprised and pleased to find out that I'm on it:




]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blog Ungodly News has created a whimsical <a href="http://www.ungodlynews.com/2011/06/periodic-table-of-atheists-and.html">periodic table of atheism</a>, and I was surprised and pleased to find out that I'm on it:</p>
<div class="center">
<a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Bay4lTZyHTE/TgYmEIFDbbI/AAAAAAAAAEM/uk50wWHaofw/s1600/tableofatheists150.jpg"><br />
<img src="http://www.daylightatheism.org/images/PeriodicTableOfAtheismSmall.jpg" alt="Periodic Table of Atheists" /><br />
</a></p>
<div ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/i-am-an-atom-of-atheism.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/i-am-an-atom-of-atheism.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Link Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/weekly-link-roundup-12.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/weekly-link-roundup-12.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Foyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hinduism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sects and Cults]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8226; Witchcraft is now a recognized profession in Romania, subjecting its practitioners to income tax. Witches who are unhappy about this are responding pretty much like you'd expect. 
&#8226; A female activist in Israel faces prison time for praying at the Wailing Wall. The telling quote:

"The ... [visit site to read more]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&bull; Witchcraft is now a recognized profession in Romania, subjecting its practitioners to income tax. Witches who are unhappy about this are responding <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/07/world/europe/07witches.html">pretty much like you'd expect</a>. </p>
<p>&bull; A female activist in Israel <a href="http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Woman+Wailing+Wall+protest+faces+prison/4071056/story.html">faces prison time for praying at the Wailing Wall</a>. The telling quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>
"The ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/weekly-link-roundup-12.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/weekly-link-roundup-12.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Language of God: Cosmology and the God Hypothesis</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-cosmology-and-the-god-hypothesis.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-cosmology-and-the-god-hypothesis.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gods of the Gaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=2671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Language of God, Chapter 3
By B.J. Marshall
Collins concludes this chapter by tying his overview of cosmology to the god hypothesis. He states that "[c]learly, the scientific view is not entirely sufficient to answer all of the interesting questions about the origin of the universe, and there is nothing inherently in conflict between the idea [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Language of God</i>, Chapter 3</p>
<p><i>By B.J. Marshall</i></p>
<p>Collins concludes this chapter by tying his overview of cosmology to the god hypothesis. He states that "[c]learly, the scientific view is not entirely sufficient to answer all of the interesting questions about the origin of the universe, and there is nothing inherently in conflict between the idea of a creator God and what science has revealed" (pp.80-1). We've already addressed this god-of-the-gaps mentality before; just ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-cosmology-and-the-god-hypothesis.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-cosmology-and-the-god-hypothesis.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Language of God: Quantum Quote-Mining</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-quantum-quote-mining.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-quantum-quote-mining.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=2641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Language of God, Chapter 3
By B.J. Marshall
Collins spends only a few pages discussing quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle. He starts with a sentence that has nothing to do with anything, really. He mentions that "Newton was a believer who wrote more about biblical interpretation than he did about mathematics and physics" (p.78). I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Language of God</i>, Chapter 3</p>
<p><i>By B.J. Marshall</i></p>
<p>Collins spends only a few pages discussing quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle. He starts with a sentence that has nothing to do with anything, really. He mentions that "Newton was a believer who wrote more about biblical interpretation than he did about mathematics and physics" (p.78). I have no idea why Collins would include this other than to say, "Hey, look everyone! This guy's a theist, and he's really smart. ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-quantum-quote-mining.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-quantum-quote-mining.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Language of God: In the Beginning...</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-in-the-beginning.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-in-the-beginning.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=2629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Language of God, Chapter 3
By B.J. Marshall
After his prelude, Collins begins at the beginning: The Big Bang. He talks about what it is, asks what came before it, and argues that it cries out for a divine explanation. The Big Bang doesn't just cry out for an explanation - no, no, no - it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Language of God</i>, Chapter 3</p>
<p><i>By B.J. Marshall</i></p>
<p>After his prelude, Collins begins at the beginning: The Big Bang. He talks about what it is, asks what came before it, and argues that it cries out for a divine explanation. The Big Bang doesn't just cry out for an explanation - no, no, no - it cries out for a <strong>divine</strong> explanation. Nothing like checking your biases at the door when doing that science thing, right?</p>
<p>We saw previously that he knows what a theory ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-in-the-beginning.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/10/tlog-in-the-beginning.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case for a Creator: The God Generator</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/10/cfac-the-god-generator.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/10/cfac-the-god-generator.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Case for a Creator, Chapter 6
For those who accept the premises of the cosmological fine-tuning argument - that the physical laws of the universe could have been different, and that there's only a small prior probability they would have taken on the values to produce intelligent beings - there are two possible explanations. One [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Case for a Creator</i>, Chapter 6</p>
<p>For those who accept the premises of the cosmological fine-tuning argument - that the physical laws of the universe could have been different, and that there's only a small prior probability they would have taken on the values to produce intelligent beings - there are two possible explanations. One is that these values were chosen by a god or other creative power. Another one, which has found favor with some cosmologists in recent years, is that there ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/10/cfac-the-god-generator.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/10/cfac-the-god-generator.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case for a Creator: This Time It&#039;s Personal</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/10/cfac-this-time-its-personal.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/10/cfac-this-time-its-personal.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gods of the Gaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Case for a Creator, Chapter 5
To wrap up his cosmological argument, William Lane Craig comes to a laughably specific conclusion:

"A cause of space and time must be an uncaused, beginningless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial, personal being endowed with freedom of will and enormous power," he said. [p.108]

(He didn't add "who is three persons in one [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Case for a Creator</i>, Chapter 5</p>
<p>To wrap up his cosmological argument, William Lane Craig comes to a laughably specific conclusion:</p>
<blockquote><p>
"A cause of space and time must be an uncaused, beginningless, timeless, spaceless, immaterial, personal being endowed with freedom of will and enormous power," he said. [p.108]
</p></blockquote>
<p>(He didn't add "who is three persons in one being and who sacrificed his son for the sins of the world", but clearly he would have gotten there ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/10/cfac-this-time-its-personal.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/10/cfac-this-time-its-personal.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case for a Creator: In the Beginning</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/09/cfac-in-the-beginning.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/09/cfac-in-the-beginning.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Case for a Creator, Chapter 5
The second premise of the kalam cosmological argument is that the universe began to exist. In discussing this premise, William Lane Craig asks the question of whether the universe necessarily had a beginning or whether it could have existed for an infinite amount of time before now. He argues [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Case for a Creator</i>, Chapter 5</p>
<p>The second premise of the kalam cosmological argument is that the universe began to exist. In discussing this premise, William Lane Craig asks the question of whether the universe necessarily had a beginning or whether it could have existed for an infinite amount of time before now. He argues that the former is the only option: </p>
<blockquote><p>
"...if the past were really infinite, then that would mean we have managed to traverse an infinite past to ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/09/cfac-in-the-beginning.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/09/cfac-in-the-beginning.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Case for a Creator: It&#039;s All Because of Quantum</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/09/cfac-its-all-because-of-quantum.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/09/cfac-its-all-because-of-quantum.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=1128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Case for a Creator, Chapter 5
In discussing the kalam argument, William Lane Craig makes some points that touch on modern research in cosmology and physics, so I'll address those. He begins with the premise that "whatever begins to exist has a cause":

"It seems metaphysically necessary that anything which begins to exist has to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Case for a Creator</i>, Chapter 5</p>
<p>In discussing the kalam argument, William Lane Craig makes some points that touch on modern research in cosmology and physics, so I'll address those. He begins with the premise that "whatever begins to exist has a cause":</p>
<blockquote><p>
"It seems metaphysically necessary that anything which begins to exist <i>has</i> to have a cause that brings it into being. Things don't just pop into existence, uncaused, out of nothing." ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/09/cfac-its-all-because-of-quantum.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2009/09/cfac-its-all-because-of-quantum.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

