<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Daylight Atheism &#187; The New Atheism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/tag/the-new-atheism/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org</link>
	<description>NIGHTTIME IS FOR DREAMING. DAYLIGHT IS FOR ACTION.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Book Review: Losing My Religion</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/losing-my-religion.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/losing-my-religion.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deconversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Summary: A hard-hitting and emotionally moving story of a religion reporter's deconversion, despite a few lingering blind spots.
Losing My Religion is the autobiography of William Lobdell, the religion reporter turned atheist whom I wrote about in 2007. I briefly mentioned the outline of his story in my previous post, but this book is a much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Summary: A hard-hitting and emotionally moving story of a religion reporter's deconversion, despite a few lingering blind spots.</i></p>
<p><i>Losing My Religion</i> is the autobiography of <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2007/08/nothing-behind-the-altar.html">William Lobdell</a>, the religion reporter turned atheist whom I wrote about in 2007. I briefly mentioned the outline of his story in my previous post, but this book is a much more in-depth account of how he found, and then ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/losing-my-religion.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/losing-my-religion.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atheists Are Not Fascists</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/atheists-are-not-fascists.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/atheists-are-not-fascists.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week, my first article on Alternet was published, which spurred several comments asking that we not forget about libertarian and conservative atheists. That's why it's so amusing that this same week, PZ Myers points out the curious ... [visit site to read more]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, my <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/alternet-atheists-as-a-political-force.html">first article on Alternet</a> was published, which spurred several comments asking that we not forget about libertarian and conservative atheists. That's why it's so amusing that this same week, PZ Myers <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/06/atheism_fascism.php">points out</a> <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/06/im_back_and_im_still_not_a_fas.php">the curious ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/atheists-are-not-fascists.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/06/atheists-are-not-fascists.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adapt or Die</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/adapt-or-die.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/adapt-or-die.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 03:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LeahAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deconversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leah @ Unequally Yoked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy and Tactics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a guest post by Leah of Unequally Yoked.  Adam is on vacation.
My previous two posts on mockery have drawn a lot of criticism, including charges that I am an accommodationist.  If that were the case, the definition of accommodationism had gotten way too broad. ... [visit site to read more]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest post by Leah of <a href="http://www.unequally-yoked.com/">Unequally Yoked</a>.  Adam is on vacation.</em></p>
<p>My previous <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/the-rapture-of-charlie-sheen.html">two</a> <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/whom-should-we-mock.html">posts</a> on mockery have drawn a lot of criticism, including charges that I am an accommodationist.  If that were the case, the definition of accommodationism had gotten way too broad. ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/adapt-or-die.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/adapt-or-die.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whom Should We Mock?</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/whom-should-we-mock.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/whom-should-we-mock.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 23:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LeahAdmin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deconversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leah @ Unequally Yoked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sects and Cults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a guest post by Leah of Unequally Yoked.  Adam is on vacation.
My last post on Daylight Atheism, asking non-believers to tone down the contempt for Harold Camping and his followers, and many of you disagreed.  Some commenters didn't believe there was anything intrinsically destructive about mocking others, others argued that ridicule was a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest post by Leah of <a href="http://www.unequally-yoked.com/">Unequally Yoked</a>.  Adam is on vacation.</em></p>
<p>My last post on Daylight Atheism, asking non-believers to <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/the-rapture-of-charlie-sheen.html">tone down the contempt for Harold Camping</a> and his followers, and many of you disagreed.  Some commenters didn't believe there was anything intrinsically destructive about mocking others, others argued that ridicule was a ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/whom-should-we-mock.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/05/whom-should-we-mock.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charity Yes, Interfaith No?</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/04/charity-yes-interfaith-no.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/04/charity-yes-interfaith-no.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheist Charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unitarian Universalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We atheists are nothing if not argumentative, and the latest argument is over whether an atheist can or should participate in "interfaith" charitable work. Chris Stedman, a member of the humanist chaplaincy at Harvard, asserts that "we must actualize our commitments to justice and compassion" by participating in interfaith projects as often as possible. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We atheists are nothing if not argumentative, and the latest argument is over whether an atheist can or should participate in "interfaith" charitable work. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-stedman/humanist-obligation-serve-good_b_849709.html">Chris Stedman</a>, a member of the humanist chaplaincy at Harvard, asserts that "we must actualize our commitments to justice and compassion" by participating in interfaith projects as often as possible. <a ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/04/charity-yes-interfaith-no.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/04/charity-yes-interfaith-no.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Activists, Beware the Veal Pen</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/activists-beware-the-veal-pen.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/activists-beware-the-veal-pen.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rotunda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ophelia and Hemant have pointed out that the White House is creating an "Interfaith and Community Service Campus Challenge" to encourage college students and religious groups to work on community-service projects. What's more, Greg Epstein, the humanist chaplain at Harvard, was invited to the kickoff meeting, and ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2011/you-mean-youre-not-going-to-throw-me-out/">Ophelia</a> and <a href="http://friendlyatheist.com/2011/03/21/interfaith-placation/">Hemant</a> have pointed out that the White House is creating an "Interfaith and Community Service Campus Challenge" to encourage college students and religious groups to work on community-service projects. What's more, Greg Epstein, the humanist chaplain at Harvard, was invited to the kickoff meeting, and <a ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/activists-beware-the-veal-pen.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/activists-beware-the-veal-pen.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Language of God: Collins vs. Dawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/tlog-collins-vs-dawkins.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/tlog-collins-vs-dawkins.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 04:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Language of God, Chapter 7
By B.J. Marshall
The next part of Francis Collins' discussion of atheism is largely an attack on Richard Dawkins. Given that The Language of God is about biology, I suppose it would seem natural to attack an evolutionary biologist like Dawkins.
Collins' first attack is that Dawkins, in The God Delusion, argues [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Language of God</i>, Chapter 7</p>
<p><i>By B.J. Marshall</i></p>
<p>The next part of Francis Collins' discussion of atheism is largely an attack on Richard Dawkins. Given that <i>The Language of God</i> is about biology, I suppose it would seem natural to attack an evolutionary biologist like Dawkins.</p>
<p>Collins' first attack is that Dawkins, in <i>The God Delusion</i>, argues that evolution fully accounts for biological complexity so there is no more need for God. "While this argument rightly ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/tlog-collins-vs-dawkins.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/tlog-collins-vs-dawkins.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Open Letter to Jeremy Stangroom</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/an-open-letter-to-jeremy-stangroom.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/an-open-letter-to-jeremy-stangroom.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Stangroom:
It's come to my attention that you've recently devoted your blog to the purpose of highlighting uncivil statements by the so-called New Atheists. This is a ... [visit site to read more]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Stangroom:</p>
<p>It's <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2011/03/the_sad_saga_of_jeremy_stangro.php">come</a> <a href="http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2011/02/28/atheist-squabble-update/">to my</a> <a href="http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2011/meta-x-11/">attention</a> that you've recently devoted your blog to the purpose of <a href="http://www.jeremystangroom.com/tag/badnewatheists/">highlighting uncivil statements by the so-called New Atheists</a>. This is a ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/an-open-letter-to-jeremy-stangroom.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/03/an-open-letter-to-jeremy-stangroom.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Language of God: A Flurry of Fallacies</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/02/tlog-a-flurry-of-fallacies.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/02/tlog-a-flurry-of-fallacies.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Language of God, Chapter 7
By B.J. Marshall                                                [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Language of God</i>, Chapter 7</p>
<p><i>By B.J. Marshall</i>                                                                     </p>
<p>Chapter 7 covers Collins' first option: "Atheism and Agnosticism: When Science Trumps Faith." I expect to cover this chapter in a number of posts - probably no fewer than four. He goes into more specific detail on agnosticism later in the chapter, so we'll save that for now. In fact, I can't ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/02/tlog-a-flurry-of-fallacies.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/02/tlog-a-flurry-of-fallacies.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Guardians of Tone</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/the-guardians-of-tone.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/the-guardians-of-tone.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Rotunda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The March of Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Image via.


I was tipped off to this excellent essay by a reader (thanks, bbk, even if it was unintentional!) and since it got buried ... [visit site to read more]
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;padding:5px;">
<img src="http://www.daylightatheism.org/images/1915_Boston.jpg" alt="Women's Anti-Suffrage Association" /></p>
<div class="caption">
Image <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2011/01/13/why-women-shouldnt-b.html">via</a>.
</div>
</div>
<p>I was tipped off to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/15/suzanne-moore-time-to-get-angry">this excellent essay</a> by a reader (thanks, bbk, even if it was unintentional!) and since it got buried ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/the-guardians-of-tone.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/the-guardians-of-tone.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>201</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Uses of Ridicule, Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/on-the-uses-of-ridicule-ii.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/on-the-uses-of-ridicule-ii.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Garden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=3007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago, I wrote a post about the uses of ridicule and the role it played in my own journey to atheism. I want to say some more about this subject, and a Daylight Atheism reader (thanks, Peter!) pointed me to this white paper from the Institute of World Politics that I'll use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago, I wrote a post about <a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/08/on-the-uses-of-ridicule.html">the uses of ridicule</a> and the role it played in my own journey to atheism. I want to say some more about this subject, and a Daylight Atheism reader (<i>thanks, Peter!</i>) pointed me to <a href="http://www.iwp.edu/news_publications/detail/ridicule-an-instrument-in-the-war-on-terrorism">this white paper</a> from the Institute of World Politics that I'll use as a jumping-off ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/on-the-uses-of-ridicule-ii.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2011/01/on-the-uses-of-ridicule-ii.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Atheist Quote of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/12/new-atheist-quote-of-the-day.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/12/new-atheist-quote-of-the-day.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ebonmuse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Loft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Atheism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daylightatheism.org/?p=2975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don't usually write posts that are just quotes, but sometimes it's nice to take a stroll down memory lane. Back in the day, this guy used to be one of the sharpest pro-science writers around, and I used to really love reading his stuff. I wonder whatever became of him.

"At its most basic level, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't usually write posts that are just quotes, but sometimes it's nice to take a stroll down memory lane. Back in the day, this guy used to be one of the sharpest pro-science writers around, and I used to really love reading his stuff. I wonder whatever became of him.</p>
<blockquote><p>
"At its most basic level, the modern Right's tension with science springs from conservatism, a political philosophy that generally resists change. The dynamism of science - its constant onslaught on old ... [<a href="http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/12/new-atheist-quote-of-the-day.html">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.daylightatheism.org/2010/12/new-atheist-quote-of-the-day.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

